Mr. Foster:
I received your 8/12/03 e-mail (below) following our telephone conversation earlier that date, regarding the examiner's amendment for the Plan 4 One trademark. We have no objection to the
amendment.
However, the last paragraph of your e-mail states: "After entry of the new lining statement, a FINAL requirement for an acceptable drawing will be issued." As of today's date, I have not received
anything further from your office. I assume that we should continue to wait until the final requirement has been received from your office before submitting the revised drawing. Alternatively, could
I proceed and submit the revised drawing at this time, although I haven't seen the final requirement. Please let me know how I should handle this. Thank you.
Claude J. Krawczyk
O'Neil, Cannon & Hollman, S.C.
111 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1400
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
414-276-5000 (ext. 4730)
414-276-6581 (fax)
claude.krawczyk@wilaw.com
>>> <ecom106@USPTO.GOV> 08/12/03 03:25PM >>>
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 78/197245
APPLICANT: Plan Administrators, Inc.
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
CLAUDE J KRAWCZYK
O'NEIL CANNON & HOLLMAN SC
111 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1400
MILWAUKEE WI 53202
RETURN ADDRESS:
Commissioner for Trademarks
2900 Crystal Drive
Arlington, VA 22202-3514
ecom106@uspto.gov
If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses
- No Fee."
MARK: PLAN 4 ONE
CORRESPONDENT'S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
Claude.Krawczyk@WILAW.COM
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and
applicant's name.
2. Date of this Office Action.
3. Examining Attorney's name and
Law Office number.
4. Your telephone number and email address.
Serial Number 78/197245
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT
In accordance with the authorization granted by Claude Krawczyk on August 12, 2003, the application has been AMENDED as indicated below. Please note that if the identification of goods or services
has been amended below, any future amendments must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. 2.71(a); TMEP section 1402.07(e). No response is necessary unless there is an objection to the amendment. If there
is an objection to the amendment, the applicant should notify the examining attorney immediately.
The prior stippling statements are deleted and replaced with the following:
The drawing is lined for shades of green, with the lower right box being
light green and the remainder of the box surrounding the numeral "4" being dark green.
Note: The original dates of use, as listed in the application as filed,
were the correct dates of use.
After entry of the new lining statement, a FINAL requirement for an
acceptable drawing will be issued.
/Steven Foster/ Trademark Attorney
Law Office 106
(703) 308-9106 Ext. 123
Fax number for the Law Office: (703) 746-8106
E-mail responses: ecom106@uspto.gov