MAGNUM
The Dallas Group of America, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78151191 |
| Registration Number | 2804746 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Raymond J. Lillie, Esq. |
| Attorney Docket Number | 162400.96 |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN |
Timeline
| 1987-06-03 | Date of First Use |
| 2002-08-06 | Application Filed |
| 2003-07-08 | Published for Opposition |
| 2004-01-13 | Trademark Registered |
| 2014-01-13 | Renewal Date |
| 2014-01-17 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2014-01-17 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  The Dallas Group of America, Inc. |
| Address | 374 Route 22 Whitehouse NJ 08888 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NJ |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,031,034,035 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0071 | Filtering machines for filtering cooking oils, shortening and other similar substances used in the food services industry comprising motors, pumps, kettles, filter paper, and filter screens |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-01-08 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2003-01-10 | 2 GNSL F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-02-07 | 3 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-02-07 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2003-05-06 | 5 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-05-06 | 6 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-06-18 | 7 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-07-08 | 8 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2003-08-21 | 9 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-01-13 | 10 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-05-30 | 11 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2009-01-27 | 12 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2009-01-30 | 13 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2009-02-04 | 14 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2014-01-07 | 15 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2014-01-17 | 16 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2014-01-07 | 17 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2014-01-17 | 18 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2014-01-17 | 19 RNL1 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2014-01-17 | 20 NA89 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2023-01-13 | 21 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2024-07-26 | 22 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 