GAMMA FINDER
W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE USA, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78144545 |
| Registration Number | 2926063 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | LORI T. MILVAIN |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | BALDWIN, SCOTT |
Timeline
| 2002-07-17 | Application Filed |
| 2004-11-29 | Amend to Register |
| 2005-02-08 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2005-02-08 | Trademark Registered |
| 2014-05-12 | Cancelled |
| 2014-05-12 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE USA, Inc. |
| Address | 4531 36th street Orlando FL 32811 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | FL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | Handheld medical device, namely, a gamma ray detector for detection of cancer cells |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-11-15 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2002-11-19 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-01-08 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-01-13 | 4 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-01-13 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-01-09 | 6 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-02-02 | 7 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-05-19 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-05-19 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-06-15 | 10 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-12-15 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-12-31 | 12 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-12-15 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-02-14 | 14 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | 2004-02-14 | 15 1.BD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-07-26 | 16 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-07-26 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-09-03 | 18 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2004-11-29 | 19 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2004-11-29 | 20 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2004-11-29 | 21 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2004-12-14 | 22 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2004-12-14 | 23 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2005-02-08 | 24 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2014-05-12 | 25 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 