Offc Action Outgoing

REDTUBE

LICENSING IP INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L.

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77978596 - REDTUBE - 19TJ

To: BRIGHT IMPERIAL LIMITED (svtmdocketing@sheppardmullin.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77978596 - REDTUBE - 19TJ
Sent: 1/27/2010 3:32:32 PM
Sent As: ECOM107@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           77/978596

 

    MARK: REDTUBE

 

 

        

*77978596*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          HAROLD MILSTEIN   

          SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP  

          990 MARSH RD

          MENLO PARK CA 94025-1949

           

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:           BRIGHT IMPERIAL LIMITED        

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          19TJ        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

           svtmdocketing@sheppardmullin.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 1/27/2010

 

 

The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

 

Specimen of Use – Class 9

 

The web page specimen is not acceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with downloadable software because it fails to provide sufficient information to enable the user to download or purchase the software from the website.  Thus, the web page appears to be mere advertising material and is not acceptable to show use in commerce for goods.  See In re Osterberg, 83 USPQ2d 1220, 1222-24 (TTAB 2007); In re Settec Inc., 80 USPQ2d 1185, 1190 (TTAB 2006); In re Genitope Corp., 78 USPQ2d 1819, 1822 (TTAB 2006); TMEP §904.03(e), (i); cf. In re Dell Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725, 1727-29 (TTAB 2004).

 

A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods specified in the statement of use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 1109.09(b).  Trademark Act Section 45 requires use of the mark “on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto.”  15 U.S.C. §1127; see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1); TMEP §§904.03, 904.04(b), (c).

 

Therefore, applicant must submit the following:

 

(1)  A substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for each class of goods specified in the statement of use; and

 

(2)  The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05; see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1).  If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.

 

Examples of specimens for downloadable software include instruction manuals, and screen printouts from (1) web pages showing the mark in connection with ordering information or information sufficient to download the software, (2) the actual program that shows the mark in the title bar, or (3) launch screens that show the mark in an introductory message box that appears after opening the program.  See TMEP §904.03(e), (i). 

 

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).

 

Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.

 

The specimens of use for the remaining classes are acceptable.

 

 

Response Option for Specimen Refusal

 

Applicant may respond to the stated specimen refusal by submitting a verified substitute specimen by following the suggested directions below for responding either online or by mail. 

 

If applicant responds to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), applicant should provide a substitute specimen as follows:  (1) answer “yes” to the TEAS response form wizard question to “submit a new or substitute specimen;” (2) attach a jpg or pdf file of the substitute specimen; (3) select the statement that “The substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.”; and (4) sign personally or enter personally his/her electronic signature and date after the declaration at the end of the TEAS response form.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(b)(2), 2.193(a), (c)-(d), (e)(1); TMEP §§611.01(c), 804.01(b).  Please note that these steps appear on different pages of the TEAS response form. 

 

If applicant experiences difficulty in submitting the required substitute specimen, supporting statement and/or declaration, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov for technical assistance regarding the TEAS response form.

 

If applicant responds to this Office action on paper, via regular mail, applicant may provide a verified substitute specimen by personally signing and dating the declaration below, and submitting a substitute specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.59(b)(2), 2.193(a)(1), (d), (e)(1); TMEP §§804.01(b), 904.05.

 

The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

_____________________________

(Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

(Date)

 

 

Response Options for Multiple Class Application

 

Applicant may respond to the stated refusal by submitting evidence and arguments against the refusal.  In addition, applicant may respond by doing one of the following:

 

(1)        Deleting the class to which the refusal pertains;

 

(2)        Filing a request to divide out the goods and/or services that have not been refused registration, so that the mark may proceed toward publication for opposition in the classes to which the refusal does not pertain.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.87.  See generally TMEP §§1110 et seq. (regarding the requirements for filing a request to divide). If applicant files a request to divide, then to avoid abandonment, applicant must also file a timely response to all outstanding issues in this Office action, including the refusal.  37 C.F.R. §2.87(e).; or

 

(3)        Amending the basis, if appropriate.  TMEP §806.03(h).  (The basis cannot be changed for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a).  TMEP §1904.01(a).)

 

 

Failure to Respond – Abandonment of Class – Advisory

 

If applicant does not respond to this Office action within the six-month period for response, then International Class 9 will be deleted from the application and the application will proceed forward for International Classes 10, 28, 41 and 45 only.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

 

 

Response Guidelines

 

There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action.  The Office recommends applicants use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to respond to Office actions online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html. 

 

If applicant responds on paper via regular mail, the response should include the title “Response to Office Action” and the following information:  (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney, (2) the serial number and filing date of the application, (3) the date of issuance of this Office action, (4) applicant’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if applicable), and (5) the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.194(b)(1); TMEP §302.03(a).

 

Applicant must explicitly address each issue raised in this Office action.  If a refusal has issued, applicant may wish to argue against the refusal, i.e., submit arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn.  To respond to requirements, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. 

 

The response must be signed by the individual applicant or by a person with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer, the equivalent of an officer for unincorporated organizations or limited liability companies, a general partner).  See TMEP §§611.03(b), 611.06 et seq., 712.01.  In the case of joint applicants, all should sign.  TMEP §611.06(a).  The proper signatory must personally sign or manually enter his/her electronic signature.  TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02.

 

 

Informational

 

The following legal authorities govern the processing of trademark and service mark applications by the Office:  The Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§1051 et seq.; The Trademark Rules of Practice, 37 C.F.R. Part 2; and the Office’s Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) (6th ed. 2009).  These legal resources are available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm.

 

Applicants may electronically file requests to change the correspondence address of up to twenty applications at one time.  TMEP §603.02(b).  The Office encourages applicants to use this time-saving form, available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

 

/Matthew J. Pappas/

Law Office 107

HELP LINE:  800-786-9199

matthew.pappas@uspto.gov (informal)

571-272-9206 phone

571-273-9107 fax

 

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77978596 - REDTUBE - 19TJ

To: BRIGHT IMPERIAL LIMITED (svtmdocketing@sheppardmullin.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77978596 - REDTUBE - 19TJ
Sent: 1/27/2010 3:32:35 PM
Sent As: ECOM107@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

                                                                

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

Your trademark application (Serial No. 77978596) has been reviewed.   The examining attorney assigned by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has written a letter (an “Office action”) on 1/27/2010 to which you must respond (unless the Office letter specifically states that no response is required).  Please follow these steps:

 

1. Read the Office letter by clicking on this link http://tmportal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow?DDA=Y&serial_number=77978596&doc_type=OOA&mail_date=20100127 OR go to  http://tmportal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow and enter your serial number to access the Office letter.  If you have difficulty accessing the Office letter, contact TDR@uspto.gov.  

                                         

PLEASE NOTE: The Office letter may not be immediately available but will be viewable within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

2. Contact the examining attorney who reviewed your application if you have any questions about the content of the Office letter (contact information appears at the end thereof).

 

3. Respond within 6 months, calculated from 1/27/2010 (or sooner if specified in the Office letter), using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form. If you have difficulty using TEAS, contact TEAS@uspto.gov. 

 

ALERT:

 

Failure to file any required response by the applicable deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT (loss) of your application.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise attempt to e-mail your response, as the USPTO does NOT accept e-mailed responses. 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed