To: | makena electronic(shenzhen)co.,ltd (sales@makenachina.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77968047 - MAKENA - N/A |
Sent: | 8/14/2010 12:40:46 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM110@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 77/968047 MARK: MAKENA | |
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: MAKENA ELECTRONIC(S; MAKENA ELECTRONIC(S |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.uspto.gov/teas/eTEASpageD.htm |
APPLICANT: makena electronic(shenzhen)co.,ltd | |
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: | |
STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/14/2010
TEAS PLUS APPLICANTS MUST SUBMIT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY OR SUBMIT FEE: Applicants who filed their application online using the reduced-fee TEAS Plus application must continue to submit certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions. See 37 C.F.R. §2.23(a)(1). For a complete list of these documents, see TMEP §819.02(b). In addition, such applicants must accept correspondence from the Office via e-mail throughout the examination process and must maintain a valid e-mail address. 37 C.F.R. §2.23(a)(2); TMEP §§819, 819.02(a). TEAS Plus applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1)(iv); TMEP §819.04. In appropriate situations and where all issues can be resolved by amendment, responding by telephone to authorize an examiner’s amendment will not incur this additional fee.
NON FINAL ACTION
INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
If the previous Office action was a final action, this letter does not serve to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. 37 C.F.R. §2.64(b); TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(c), 718.03(b).
Applicant has submitted a color drawing and provided a color claim, but has not provided a clear and concise mark description of the literal and design elements that specifies where all the colors appear in those elements. (“The mark consists of the arial black or white letter MAKENA as shown by the picture”) is not clear. As the mark is in black and white, applicant can make no claim as to color, and simply state “color is not claimed as a feature of the mark”. See below for directions if applicant wants to claim black and white as colors of the mark. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); see TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq.
If black, white and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must state that the colors black, white and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. TMEP §807.07(d). Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise. TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(a)(ii).
Therefore, applicant must provide a description of the literal and design elements in the mark that specifies where all the colors appear in those elements. The following description is suggested, if accurate: “The mark consists of the word MAKENA in black in a white box outlined in black.” TMEP §807.07(a)(ii).
Applicant’s response must be properly signed by (1) the individual applicant (for joint individual applicants, both must sign) or (2) someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner). See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(a), (e)(2)(ii); TMEP §§611.03(b), 611.06 et seq., 712.01. If applicant retains an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(i); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01. The individual(s) signing must personally sign or personally enter his/her electronic signature. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(a), (e)(2)(ii); TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02.
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end, the trademark will fail to register, and the application fee will not be refunded. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a), 2.209(a); TMEP §§405.04, 718.01, 718.02. In such case, applicant’s only option would be to file a timely petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to live status. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714. There is a $100 fee for such petitions. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.66(b)(1).
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Dezmona J. Mizelle-Howard/
Dezmona J. Mizelle-Howard
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Law Office 110
571.272.9368
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form at http://teasroa.uspto.gov/roa/. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) at http://tarr.uspto.gov/. Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen. If TARR shows no change for more than six months, call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.