SURPASS (1% DICLOFENAC SODIUM)
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77962407 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Meredith P. Gammill |
| Attorney Docket Number | 61518-220 |
| Law Office Assigned | L90 |
| Employee Name | STRUCK, ROBERT J |
Timeline
| 2010-03-18 | Application Filed |
| 2010-06-15 | Published for Opposition |
| 2010-08-10 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2011-01-24 | Abandon |
| 2011-01-25 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. |
| Address | 2621 North Belt Highway St. Joseph DE 645062002 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 030501 | Horses |
| 030524 | Stylized horses and donkeys |
| 260101 | Circles as carriers or as single line borders |
| 261709 | Bands, curved; Bars, curved; Curved line(s), band(s) or bar(s); Lines, curved |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-03-22 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-03-23 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2010-03-24 | 3 MDSM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2010-03-25 | 4 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | 2010-03-25 | 5 TAEA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-04-27 | 6 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2010-04-28 | 7 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2010-04-28 | 8 GNEA F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2010-04-28 | 9 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2010-04-28 | 10 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2010-04-28 | 11 CNSA P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2010-05-10 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2010-05-10 | 13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2010-06-15 | 14 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2010-06-15 | 15 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2010-06-24 | 16 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2010-08-10 | 17 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-11-08 | 18 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | 2011-01-24 | 19 EXAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | 2011-01-25 | 20 ABN5 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | 2011-01-25 | 21 MAB5 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 