Offc Action Outgoing

STEMS

1Foot 2Foot Centre for Foot and Ankle Care, P.C.

U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3921999 - STEMS - 74211.4

To: 1Foot 2Foot Centre for Foot and Ankle Ca (HWRITM@HuntonAK.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3921999 - STEMS - 74211.4
Sent: 12/11/20 04:53:03 PM
Sent As: prg@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Owner’s Trademark Registration

 

U.S. Registration No. 3921999

 

Mark:  STEMS

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

       Stephen P. Demm

       Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

       Riverfront Plaza, East Tower

       951 East Byrd Street

       Richmond VA 23219-4074

 

 

 

 

 

Owner:  1Foot 2Foot Centre for Foot and Ankle Ca

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 74211.4            

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

       HWRITM@HuntonAK.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

 

The USPTO must receive the owner’s response to this letter within the time period specified below.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears below.

 

Issue date:  December 11, 2020

 

 

The Combined Section 8 Affidavit & Section 9 Renewal Application received on December 2, 2020, is otherwise acceptable; however, the owner of the registration must comply with an audit as explained below. 

 

Registration Selected for Audit

 

The USPTO is performing random audits of U.S. trademark registrations to assess and promote the accuracy and integrity of the trademark register.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h). This registration has been randomly selected for audit to determine whether the mark is in use with all of the services identified in the declaration of use submitted to maintain the registration. 

 

Detailed information regarding the audit program is provided on the following webpage – http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-maintaining-trademark-registration/post-registration-audit-program.

 

To comply with the audit, you must submit proof of use of the registered mark for two additional services per class.  Id. 

 

Specifically, the owner must submit the following:

 

(1)   Proof of current use of the registered mark in commerce for the following services:

 

Medical spa services, namely, laser hair removal” and “full body massage services” in International Class 44; and

 

(2)   The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted proof of use, during the relevant period for filing the affidavit of use.”  37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h).

 

Additionally, you must identify the corresponding services supported by each item submitted as proof of use.  See id. 

 

Examples of proof of use.  Electronic proof of use may be an actual image, such as a photograph, scanned copy, or screen capture, of the physical item.

 

Acceptable proof of use for services includes signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the actual sale or advertising of the services. 

 

Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen, whether for goods or services, must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed. 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c).

 

If proof of use for the requested services is unavailable, the identified services and any other services not currently in use should be deleted from the registration. Please see the WARNING below for the possible consequence of deleting any services identified for audit.

 

Form Declaration

 

Please note that the below statement verifying proof of use is slightly different than the standard substitute specimen statement.

 

The following statement and declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 can be used to verify the use of the mark as evidenced by the item(s) submitted as proof of use, if properly signed and dated:

 

The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted proof of use, during the relevant period for filing the affidavit of use.

 

The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of this submission, declares that the facts set forth above are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

__________________________

Signature of Authorized Person

__________________________

Type or Print Name

__________________________

Date

 

WARNING:  If your response to this Office action does not meet the requirements of the audit, or includes a request to delete any of the services identified for the audit, and services remain in the registration without acceptable proof of use, a second Office action will issue requiring proof of use for all remaining services for which proof of use is not of record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h).  Therefore, the owner should delete all services for which proof of use cannot be provided. 

 

If the owner deletes any audited services, it may provide proof of use for all remaining services for which proof of use is not of record to avoid a possible second Office action. 

 

Fee Changes

 

On January 2, 2021, the USPTO will be changing and establishing new fees for certain post registration filings.  See Trademark Fee Adjustment, 85 Fed. Reg. 73,197 (Nov. 17, 2020) (to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pts. 2 and 7).  One of the new fees will be required when a trademark owner deletes goods, services, or classes from a registration after a Section 8 or 71 Affidavit or Declaration is filed and before it is accepted.  This new fee is required for each request to delete filed on or after January 2, 2021, regardless of when the Section 8 or 71 Affidavit or Declaration was filed, and even if the fee was paid for a previous deletion in the same class.  However, this fee is not required if deletions are either made within the Section 8 or 71 Affidavit or Declaration or in a Section 7 Request filed before the Section 8 or 71 Affidavit or Declaration is filed.  See the fee rule webpage for more information about the fee changes.

 

RESPONSE TIME DEADLINE:  A complete response must be received within 6 months from the issuance date of this Office action or on or before the registration expiration date of February 22, 2021, whichever is later.  The owner must respond to all inquiries set forth in this Office action to avoid cancellation and/or expiration of the registration.  If a response is not received, and there is no time remaining in the grace period to file a new affidavit, the registration will be cancelled and will expire in its entirety.  37 C.F.R. §§2.163(b)-(c) and 2.184(b)(1); TMEP §§1604.16 and 1606.12.

 

ADVISORY:  If a response to this Office action is not filed within the response deadline above, and time remains in the grace period, the registrant may avoid cancellation and/or expiration of its registration by filing a new affidavit of use and a new renewal application within the grace period.  37 C.F.R. §§2.163(c) and 2.184(b)(1).  Additional fees are required to file a new renewal application during the grace period.  37 C.F.R. §§2.161(d)(1)-(2) and 2.183(b)-(c).  For more information about this, please contact the undersigned.

 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a Response to Post-Registration Office action. 

 

Direct questions about this Office action to the Post Registration staff member below.

 

 

/Celia Abednego/

                                                                                   

Celia Abednego

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Post Registration Division (Work Project)

Wk. Phone: 571-272-9492

celia.abednego@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an owner’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3921999 - STEMS - 74211.4

To: 1Foot 2Foot Centre for Foot and Ankle Ca (HWRITM@HuntonAK.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3921999 - STEMS - 74211.4
Sent: 12/11/20 04:53:03 PM
Sent As: prg@uspto.gov
Attachments:





United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)


USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE


Office action (Official Letter) issued
on 12/11/2020 for
U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3921999


Your trademark document has been reviewed. The assigned staff member has issued an official letter, and you may be required to respond to avoid cancellation of your registration or final rejection of your filing.

What to do next
1. Read the official letter.
Carefully review the letter to determine:
  • Whether a response is required, and if so, the response deadline.
2. Respond if required.
If you're required to respond, we must receive your response before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.

If you have questions
  • Direct questions about the letter to the staff member identified in the letter.
  • Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website , the registration maintenance process, the status of your registration, or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).




Your ongoing responsibilities

  • Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your registration. Private companies not associated with the USPTO often use public information from trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices - most of which require fees. These companies often have names similar to the USPTO. All official USPTO correspondence is emailed from the domain "@uspto.gov." For a current list of companies the USPTO has received complaints about, information on how to identify these offers and notices, and what to do if you receive one, see the misleading notices webpage.



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed