To: | Biosafe Environmental Services, Inc. (ccaseiro@verrilldana.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77903005 - BIOS - BIOS-001TM |
Sent: | 3/25/2010 8:06:08 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM114@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/903005
MARK: BIOS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: 1 PORTLAND SQ |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Biosafe Environmental Services, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/25/2010
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:
SEARCH CONDUCTED
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
CLASS ADDED
The application did not specify a classification for the services. The application has been amended to classify the services in International Class 37. 37 C.F.R. §2.85; TMWP §1401.03(b).
IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES INDEFINITE – CLARIFICATION REQUIRED
Applicant must amend this wording to specify the common commercial or generic name for the services. If there is no common commercial or generic name for the services, then applicant must describe the nature of the services as well as their main purpose, channels of trade, and the intended consumer(s).
Applicant may adopt the following identification of services, for example, if accurate:
Class 37
Environmental remediation services, namely, asbestos abatement and lead abatement; Installation of building insulation; Building sealing services; Window installation; Energy saving building construction services in the field of energy efficiency improvements
Class 40
Mold remediation services
See TMEP §1402.01.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
It is the applicant’s duty to identify the goods and/or services, and any goods and/or services deleted from the application by amendment may not be reinserted at a later point in prosecution. TMEP §1402.01(e).
Please note that, if applicant elects to use wording in the identification of goods and/or services that diverges from the wording provided in the Identification Manual, applicant should be prepared to 1) provide examples of similar wording used for the same goods and/or services in registrations on the principal register, or 2) show that applicant’s proposed wording is otherwise acceptable as definite.
REQUIREMENTS FOR A COMBINED APPLICATION
If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the following for those services based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b):
(1) Applicant must list the services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order. TMEP § 1403.01; and
(2) Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of services not covered by the fee already paid (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov). 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810 and 1403.01.
INSUFFICIENT FEE – ADDITIONAL FEE(S) REQUIRED
Therefore, applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fee(s) already paid, or (2) submit the fees for the additional class(es).
Applicant must state for the record the significance of the wording “BIOS” in relation to applicant’s services. See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §808.01(c).
This information is necessary to evaluate accurately and fully the registrability of the applicant’s proposed designation. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.61(b); TMEP sections 1103.04 and 1105.02. If the applicant does not provide the information required herein, registration may be refused. The Trademark Rules of Practice have the effect of law and failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusal of registration. See, e.g., In re Joseph Edward Page, 1999 TTAB LEXIS 229 (TTAB 1999); In re Babies Beat, Inc., 13 USPQ2d 1729 (TTAB 1990); In re Big Daddy's Lounges, Inc., 200 USPQ 371 (TTAB 1978); In re Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., 192 USPQ2d 84, 85-86 (TTAB 1976); and In re Morrison Industries, Inc., 178 USPQ 432, 433-34 (TTAB 1973).
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action. The Office recommends applicants use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to respond to Office actions online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html. However, if applicant responds on paper via regular mail, the response should include the title “Response to Office Action” and the following information: (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney, (2) the serial number and filing date of the application, (3) the mailing date of this Office action, (4) applicant’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if applicable), and (5) the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.194(b)(1); TMEP §302.03(a).
The response should address each refusal and/or requirement raised in the Office action. If a refusal has issued, applicant can argue against the refusal; i.e., applicant can submit arguments and evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. To respond to requirements, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them into the application record.
/Edward Fennessy/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 114
1.571.272.8804
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.