Examiners Amendment Priority

HOOPSHOTS PHOTO CENTER BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME SPRINGFIELD MASS

NAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME, INC.

Examiners Amendment Priority

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:         77/778139

 

    MARK: HOOPSHOTS PHOTO CENT     

 

 

        

*77778139*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          DEBORAH A. BASILE

          DOHERTY, WALLACE, PILLSBURY AND MURPHY,      

          1414 MAIN ST STE 1900

          SPRINGFIELD, MA 01144-7000

           

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:          NAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAM ETC.           

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          69007-3        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

          

 

 

 

EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION

 

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT

 

OFFICE SEARCH:  The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP section 704.02.   

 

AMENDMENT: In accordance with the authorization granted by Deborah Basile on September 9, 2009, the application has been AMENDED as indicated below. Please advise the undersigned immediately if there is an objection to the amendment. Otherwise, no response is necessary. TMEP §707.

 

The following disclaimer is entered into the record:

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “PHOTO CENTER” and “SPRINGFIELD MASS” apart from the mark as shown.

 

The description of the mark is amended to read:

 

The mark consists of the stylized word "HOOPSHOTS" with a camera with a flash in place of the first letter "O" in the word "HOOPSHOTS" and a basketball in place of the third letter "O" in the word "HOOPSHOTS.” Under this are the words PHOTO CENTER. Between these words is a design of a basketball with the wording BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME SPRINGFIELD MASS on it.

 

PRIORITY ACTION

 

The following issues were discussed with the person listed above.

 

NEW DRAWING REQUIRED

 

The drawing is not acceptable because the basketball design and wording on it is not visible. A clear drawing of the mark is an application requirement. 37 C.F.R. §2.52. Therefore, applicant must submit a new drawing showing a clear depiction of the mark.  All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, and not fine or crowded.  37 C.F.R. §§2.53(c), 2.54(e); TMEP §§807.05(c), 807.06(a).

 

If applicant submits a new drawing in the form of a digitized image, it must be in jpg format.  The Office recommends that the digitized image have a length and width no smaller than 250 pixels and no larger than 944 pixels.  37 C.F.R. §2.53(c); TMEP §807.05(c).

 

Amendments or changes to the applied-for mark in a substitute drawing will not be accepted if the changes would materially alter the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.72; see TMEP §§807.13 et seq., 807.14.

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action.  The Office recommends applicants use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to respond to Office actions online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If applicant responds on paper via regular mail, the response should include the title “Response to Office Action” and the following information:  (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney, (2) the serial number and filing date of the application, (3) the date of issuance of this Office action, (4) applicant’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if applicable), and (5) the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.194(b)(1); TMEP §302.03(a).

 

In the response, applicant should explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in the Office action.  If a refusal has issued, applicant may wish to argue against the refusal, i.e., submit arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and why the mark should register.  To respond to requirements, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. 

 

The response must be signed by applicant or someone with legal authority to bind applicant. TMEP §§605.02, 712.  The signer must personally sign and date the response or manually enter their electronic signature in the signature block.  TMEP §605.02

 

If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.

 

 

/Fred Carl III/

Law Office 108

571 272 8867 voice

571 273 9108 fax for official communication only

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed