Offc Action Outgoing

3 POINT CIRCLE

NAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME, INC.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           77/754156

 

    MARK: 3 POINT CIRCLE 

 

 

        

*77754156*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          DEBORAH A. BASILE

          DOHERTY, WALLACE, PILLSBURY AND MURPHY,      

          1414 MAIN ST STE 1900

          SPRINGFIELD, MA 01144-7000

           

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:           NAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAM ETC.

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          69007-3        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

          

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SPECIMEN REQUIRED

 

The specimen is not acceptable because it does not show the applied-for mark used in connection with any of the services specified in the statement of use.  A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of services specified in the statement of use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 1109.09(b). 

 

In this case, the specimen shows use on what appears will be an award or “recognition program” for basketball coaches. However, applicant has identified its services as:

 

educational and entertainment services, namely, a basketball museum and library, basketball games, basketball contests, basketball camps and clinics and enshrinement ceremonies

 

The specimen does not show use of the mark on any of these services. Additionally, the specimen provided does not indicate that anything is currently offered under the mark, but that the project is in the planning stages. The text of the letter provided reads, in part:

 

We are beginning this project by gathering data from State Associations about coaches who have reached or exceeded 300, 400 & 500 wins in their career at the high school level. As we gather this data a committee of our Trustees  will determine the “win total” where the recognition begins so that it is both a meaningful number  of coaches to be recognized and a significant hurdle for coaches to surpass in their careers.

 

This wording indicates that while there is a plan in place for something to happen, it remains in the planning stage. Therefore, applicant must submit the following:

 

(1)  A substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for each class of services specified in the statement of use; and

 

(2)  The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33: The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.”  37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05.  If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.

 

Examples of specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the actual sale or advertising of the services.  See TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.

 

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a service mark for the identified services.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).

 

Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.88; TMEP §1109.17.

 

Applicant is encouraged to submit its response online. If it does, the online response form should launch the proper declaration to sign with the response, when applicant elects “yes” in response to item “Do you want to submit a Signed Declaration?” If the applicant provides a paper response to this office action, the following is a sample declaration for a verified substitute specimen for use in a paper response:

 

The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

 

_____________________________

(Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

(Date)

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action.  The Office recommends applicants use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to respond to Office actions online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If applicant responds on paper via regular mail, the response should include the title “Response to Office Action” and the following information:  (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney, (2) the serial number and filing date of the application, (3) the date of issuance of this Office action, (4) applicant’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if applicable), and (5) the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.194(b)(1); TMEP §302.03(a).

 

In the response, applicant should explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in the Office action.  If a refusal has issued, applicant may wish to argue against the refusal, i.e., submit arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and why the mark should register.  To respond to requirements, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. 

 

The response must be signed by applicant or someone with legal authority to bind applicant. TMEP §§605.02, 712.  The signer must personally sign and date the response or manually enter their electronic signature in the signature block.  TMEP §605.02

 

If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.

 

 

/Fred Carl III/

Law Office 108

571 272 8867 voice

571 273 9108 fax for official communication only

 

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed