Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/21/2009

 

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 8/20/09 in which applicant submitted an amendment to the mark description and a Section 2(f) claim of acquired distinctiveness.

 

The following requirement has been satisfied:  the requirement for an acceptable mark description.  TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.

 

After review of applicant’s response and the record, the following issues have been found:

 

UNNECESSARY SECTION 2(f) CLAIM SHOULD BE DELETED OR EXPLAINED

 

Applicant claims that the applied-for mark has acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f).  However, this claim is unnecessary because the mark appears to be inherently distinctive.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(f); TMEP §1212.02(d). 

 

Applicant can withdraw the claim of acquired distinctiveness by instructing the trademark examining attorney to delete it from the application record.  See TMEP §1212.02(d).  If applicant does not withdraw the claim, it will remain in the application record and be printed on the registration certificate.

MARK DIFFERS ON DRAWING AND SPECIMEN- continued and maintained

 

The mark on the specimen disagrees with the mark on the drawing.  In this case, the specimen submitted with the application shows the mark in the color white.  However, the drawing shows the mark in the colors red, blue and gray.

 

An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).  The mark on the drawing must be a substantially exact representation of the mark on the specimen.  37 C.F.R. §2.51(a); TMEP §807.12(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(1).  In addition, the drawing of the mark can be amended only if the amendment does not materially alter the mark as originally filed.  37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2); TMEP §§807.12(a), 807.14 et seq.

 

Therefore, applicant must submit one of the following:

 

(1)  A new color drawing of the mark that agrees with the colors of the mark on the specimen and does not materially alter the original mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2); TMEP §§807.07(d)(i), 807.12(a), 807.14 et seq.  Amending the drawing to agree with the specimen would not be considered a material alteration of the mark in this case.  However, applicant must also provide a statement listing all the colors that are claimed as a feature of the mark and a statement describing the literal and design elements of the mark that specifies where all the colors appear in those elements.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(d)(i).  If black, white and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must state that the colors black, white and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark.  TMEP §807.07(d).  Generic color names must be used in the color claim and mark description, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise.  TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(a)(ii).;

 

(2)  A new black and white drawing of the mark, with a statement authorizing the deletion of any color claim or color description.  Deleting color, however, must not materially alter the original mark.  See TMEP §§807.07(a)(i), 807.07(d)(i).  Amending the drawing to delete color would not be considered a material alteration of the mark in this case.; or

 

(3)  A substitute specimen showing use in commerce of the mark in the colors depicted on the drawing, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33:  “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.”  See 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §§807.07(d)(i), 904.02(c)(ii).  If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.

 

If applicant cannot satisfy one of the above requirements, applicant may amend the application from a use in commerce basis under Trademark Act Section 1(a) to an intent to use basis under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required.  See TMEP §806.03(c).  However, if applicant amends the basis to Section 1(b), registration will not be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen.  See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c)-(d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103.

 

To amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33:  “Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the filing date of the application.”  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b); see 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1).

 

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark and/or service mark.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).

 

The following is a sample declaration for a verified substitute specimen for use in a paper response:

 

The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

 

_____________________________

(Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

(Date)

 

If applicant has questions about its application or this Office action, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney at the telephone number below.

 

 

 

 

/Courtney McCormick/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 108

Office: (571) 272-2907

Fax: (571) 273-9108

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

Your trademark application (Serial No. 77737605) has been reviewed.   The examining attorney assigned by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has written a letter (an “Office action”) on 8/21/2009 to which you must respond (unless the Office letter specifically states that no response is required).  Please follow these steps:

 

1. Read the Office letter by clicking on this link http://tmportal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow?DDA=Y&serial_number=77737605&doc_type=OOA&mail_date=20090821 OR go to  http://tmportal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow and enter your serial number to access the Office letter.  If you have difficulty accessing the Office letter, contact TDR@uspto.gov.  

                                         

PLEASE NOTE: The Office letter may not be immediately available but will be viewable within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

2. Contact the examining attorney who reviewed your application if you have any questions about the content of the Office letter (contact information appears at the end thereof).

 

3. Respond within 6 months, calculated from 8/21/2009 (or sooner if specified in the Office letter), using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form. If you have difficulty using TEAS, contact TEAS@uspto.gov. 

 

ALERT:

 

Failure to file any required response by the applicable deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT (loss) of your application.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise attempt to e-mail your response, as the USPTO does NOT accept e-mailed responses.