Trademark Filing
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Application Filed: 2008-11-11
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
| Serial Number | 77612039 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 2000: Illustration: Drawing or design without any word(s)/letter(s)/ number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Mark Tidman |
| Attorney Docket Number | 87394- |
| Law Office Assigned | M80 |
| Employee Name | LEE, DOUGLAS M |
Timeline
| 1981-00-00 | Date of First Use |
| 2008-11-11 | Application Filed |
| 2011-12-13 | Abandon |
| 2011-12-13 | Location: LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2011-12-13 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Johnson Controls, Inc. |
| Address | 5757 North Green Bay Avenue Milwaukee WI 53201 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | WI |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 150125 | Air pumps, motorized; Compactors, industrial and commercial; Door closers; Fulcrums; Pumps, air (motorized); Robots, industrial; Trash compactors, industrial |
| 150925 | Battery chargers; Chips and board hardware for computers; Circuit boards; Computer chips and circuits; Controllers, electrical; Electric connectors and circuitry lines; Electrical charging devices; Electrical controllers; Fuseboxes; Fuses, electrical |
| 170725 | Geiger counters; Metal detectors (hand |
| 261925 | Geometric solids other than spheres, cylinders, cones, cube, prisms or pyramids |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2008-11-14 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2008-11-15 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2009-02-10 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-02-11 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2009-02-11 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2009-02-11 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2009-08-11 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-08-11 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-08-12 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-08-14 | 10 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2009-08-14 | 11 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2009-08-14 | 12 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2010-02-16 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2010-02-16 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2010-02-17 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2010-02-24 | 16 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2010-02-24 | 17 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2010-02-24 | 18 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2010-08-24 | 19 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2010-08-24 | 20 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2010-08-24 | 21 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2010-08-24 | 22 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2010-09-10 | 23 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2010-09-10 | 24 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2010-09-10 | 25 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2010-09-23 | 26 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2010-09-23 | 27 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2010-09-23 | 28 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2010-09-23 | 29 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2010-09-23 | 30 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2010-09-23 | 31 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2010-09-23 | 32 GEA1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2010-12-01 | 33 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2010-12-01 | 34 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2011-01-21 | 35 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2011-01-21 | 36 GNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2011-01-21 | 37 GNSN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | 2011-02-11 | 38 RBFT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2011-09-27 | 39 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2011-12-13 | 40 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2011-12-13 | 41 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2011-12-13 | 42 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 