APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT CYCLE MANAGER
Fujitsu Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77606989 |
| Registration Number | 3652861 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Domestic Representative | David M. Pitcher and Alexander H. Butterman of Staas &am |
| Attorney Name | Mainak H. Mehta |
| Attorney Docket Number | 120776-FJT02 |
| Law Office Assigned | M40 |
| Employee Name | MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA |
Timeline
| 2008-11-04 | Application Filed |
| 2009-05-13 | Amend to Register |
| 2009-07-07 | Trademark Registered |
| 2015-08-06 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 |
| 2015-08-06 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  FUJITSU LIMITED |
| Address | 1-1, Kamikodanaka 4-chome, Nakahara-ku Kawasaki-shi, Kana JP 2118588 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | JP |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Computer software for establishing business systems requirements, configuring software, assessing and managing quality, providing source code analysis and monitoring software lifecycles during application and document software development; document management software |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2008-11-07 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2009-01-26 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-01-29 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2009-01-29 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2009-05-13 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-05-14 | 6 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-05-18 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-05-18 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2009-05-28 | 9 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2009-05-28 | 10 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 2009-05-29 | 11 CNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2009-06-02 | 12 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-06-03 | 13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2009-07-07 | 14 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | 2015-07-06 | 15 ES8R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2015-08-06 | 16 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 2015-08-06 | 17 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | 2015-08-06 | 18 NAS8 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2018-07-07 | 19 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-02-14 | 20 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 