FAT BOY BREWERY

Frantz, Jason

Application Filed: 2008-08-29

Trademark Application Details

Status

602

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED-FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	77558846
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Law Office Assigned	M80
Employee Name	CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K

Timeline

2008-08-29	Application Filed
2011-04-26	Abandon
2011-05-23	Location: LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
2011-05-23	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Frantz, Jason
Address	9 Brookman Street Worcester MA US 01606
Legal Entity Type	Individual
Legal Entity State	US

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

FRANTZ, JASON
9 BROOKMAN ST
WORCESTER, MA 01606-2512

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	32
U.S. Codes:	045,046,048

Type Code	Type
GS0321	Beer

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2008-09-03	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2008-12-06	2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2008-12-06	3 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2008-12-06	4 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2008-12-06	5 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2008-12-12	6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2008-12-30	7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2008-12-30	8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2008-12-30	9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED	2009-01-15	10 NAUD R:Renewal
NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	2009-01-15	11 GAUD O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	2009-01-15	12 GAUN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2009-01-23	13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2009-02-04	14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2009-02-04	15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	2009-02-26	16 CNSL R:Renewal
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	2009-02-26	17 GNSL S:
NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	2009-02-26	18 GNS3 O:Outgoing Correspondence
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED	2009-02-26	19 UNDC O:Outgoing Correspondence
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	2009-09-14	20 RCSC S:
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	2010-03-17	21 RCSC S:
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2010-09-22	22 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION	2010-09-23	23 RCCK S:
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2010-10-25	24 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2010-10-25	25 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2010-10-25	26 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	2011-05-23	27 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	2011-05-23	28 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN	2011-06-10	29 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.