Offc Action Outgoing

MECCO

MECCO PARTNERS, LLC

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77549199 - MECCO - N/A

To: MECCO PARTNERS, LLC (tperles@kwbhlaw.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77549199 - MECCO - N/A
Sent: 12/4/2008 6:23:03 PM
Sent As: ECOM110@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           77/549199

 

    MARK: MECCO    

 

 

        

*77549199*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          ANDREW J. CORNELIUS       

          KEEVICAN WEISS BAUERLE & HIRSCH, LLC        

          1001 LIBERTY AVENUE

          11TH FLOOR, FEDERATED INVESTORS TOWER    

          PITTSBURGH, PA 15222          

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:           MECCO PARTNERS, LLC   

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          N/A        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

           tperles@kwbhlaw.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/4/2008

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

Refusal – Specimen Does Not Show Mark on Class 8 Goods

 

The specimens are not acceptable for Class 8 because they do not show the applied-for mark used in connection with any of the Class 8 goods specified in the application.  An application must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services based on Section 1(a) in the application.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04. 

 

In this case, the specimens appear to show the mark on marking machines rather than hand tools. 

 

Therefore, applicant must submit the following:

 

(1)   A substitute specimen showing use of the mark for Class 8; and

 

(2)   The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: The specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.”  37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05.  If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c).

 

Examples of specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging, or displays associated with the goods at their point of sale.  TMEP §§904.03 et seq. 

 

Pending a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark or service mark for the identified goods or services.  15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.

 

Applicant must respond to the requirements set forth below.

 

Identification of Goods

 

The applicant is advised that “Laser systems composed of lasers and scanners for material processing namely marking, engraving, etching, material ablation, material cutting and perforation” are properly classified in International Class 9.  Therefore, the applicant must delete this wording from the identification in International Class 7.

 

Identifications of goods can be amended only to clarify or limit the goods; adding to or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.

 

Requirements for Adding a Class

 

If the applicant adds International Class 9 to this application, then the applicant must comply with each of the requirements below for those goods based on actual use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a):

 

(1)        Applicant must list the goods by international class;

 

(2)        Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods not covered by the fee already paid (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov); and

 

(3)        For each additional international class of goods, applicant must submit:

 

a.   Dates of first use of the mark anywhere and dates of first use of the mark in commerce, or a statement that the dates of use in the initial application apply to that class; and the dates of use, both anywhere and in commerce, must be at least as early as the filing date of the application;

 

b.   One specimen showing use of the mark for each class of goods and/or services; and the specimen must have been in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.  If a single specimen supports multiple classes, applicant should indicate which classes the specimen supports rather than providing multiple copies of the same specimen;

 

c.   A statement that “the specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application;” and

 

d.   Verification of the statements in 3(a) and 3(c) (above) in an affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33.  Verification is not required where (1) the dates of use for the added class are stated to be the same as the dates of use specified in the initial application, and (2) the original specimens are acceptable for the added class(es).

 

See 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1), 2.71(c), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

The specimen of record is acceptable for International Class 7 only.

 

Translation and Significance of Mark

 

The applicant must submit an English translation of MECCO, if there is one.  TMEP §809; see 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a), 2.61(b).  In addition, the applicant must specify whether the wording “MECCO” has any significance in the relevant trade or industry or as applied to the goods described in the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§808.01(c), 814.

 

Claim of Prior Registrations

 

If applicant is the owner of U.S. Registration Nos. 3529876 and 1082317, then applicant must submit a claim of ownership.  37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812.  The following standard format is suggested:

 

Applicant is the owner of U.S. Registration Nos. 3529876 and 1082317.

 

Search Results

 

The Office records have been searched and there are no similar registered or pending marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.

 

 

/StevenFine/

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 110

(571) 272-9158

 

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77549199 - MECCO - N/A

To: MECCO PARTNERS, LLC (tperles@kwbhlaw.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77549199 - MECCO - N/A
Sent: 12/4/2008 6:23:04 PM
Sent As: ECOM110@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

                                                                

IMPORTANT NOTICE

USPTO OFFICE ACTION HAS ISSUED ON 12/4/2008 FOR

APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 77549199

 

Please follow the instructions below to continue the prosecution of your application:

  

VIEW OFFICE ACTION: Click on this link http://tmportal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow?DDA=Y&serial_number=77549199&doc_type=OOA&mail_date=20081204 (or copy and paste this URL into the address field of your browser), or visit http://tmportal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow and enter the application serial number to access the Office action.

 

PLEASE NOTE: The Office action may not be immediately available but will be viewable within 24 hours of this notification.

 

RESPONSE MAY BE REQUIRED: You should carefully review the Office action to determine (1) if a response is required; (2) how to respond; and (3) the applicable response time period. Your response deadline will be calculated from 12/4/2008.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise attempt to e-mail your response, as the USPTO does NOT accept e-mailed responses.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System response form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm.

 

HELP: For technical assistance in accessing the Office action, please e-mail

TDR@uspto.gov.  Please contact the assigned examining attorney with questions about the Office action. 

 

        WARNING

1. The USPTO will NOT send a separate e-mail with the Office action attached.

 

2. Failure to file any required response by the applicable deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed