To: | Russell Corporation (ldooley@fruit.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77496215 - SLAM JAM - N/A |
Sent: | 9/19/2008 2:43:59 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM112@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/496215
MARK: SLAM JAM
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Russell Corporation
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/19/2008
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
In this case, the following factors are the most relevant: similarity of the marks, similarity of the goods, and similarity of trade channels of the goods. See In re Opus One, Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1812 (TTAB 2001); In re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1593 (TTAB 1999); In re Azteca Rest. Enters., Inc., 50 USPQ2d 1209 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
For the reasons set forth below, the examining attorney submits that the applicant’s mark, SLAM JAM for “Backboards for basketball; Basketball goals” is highly similar to the registered mark, HUFFY SLAM JAM for “Basketball goal and backboard assemblies.”
In a likelihood of confusion determination, the marks are compared for similarities in their appearance, sound, meaning or connotation and commercial impression. In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP §1207.01(b). Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find a likelihood of confusion. In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB 1988); In re Lamson Oil Co., 6 USPQ2d 1041, 1043 (TTAB 1987); see TMEP §1207.01(b).
The marks in the present case are nearly identical. The applicant’s mark, SLAM JAM is highly similar to the registered mark, HUFFY SLAM JAM. The marks are similar because they share the same identical wording “SLAM JAM.” The minor difference between the marks is the addition of the wording “HUFFY” in the registered mark. This wording does not change the overall commercial impression of the marks because it is merely the registrant’s house mark. Thus, the wording “SLAM JAM” is the dominant element that is present in both marks and the marks are essentially similar.
Similarity Between the Goods
The goods in the present case are identical and are likely to emanate from a common source. The applicant’s goods are “Backboards for basketball; Basketball goals.” The registrant’s goods are “Basketball goal and backboard assemblies.” The goods are nearly identical because they are both basketball goals. The additional goods in the registrant’s mark, namely, “backboard assemblies” are merely goods that are used to construct the basketball goals. Thus, they are highly related to the goods in the applicant’s mark.
Accordingly, because the marks are similar and the goods are related, confusion is likely and registration is refused under Trademark Act Section 2(d) based on a likelihood of confusion.
Applicant must respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.
Claim of Prior Registration is Cancelled
Applicant’s claim of ownership of U.S. Registration No. 1954498 will not be printed on any registration which may issue from this application because Office records show that the claimed registration is cancelled. Only claims of ownership of live registrations are printed. 37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812.
/JKF/
Jay K. Flowers
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 112
Phone:(571) 272-8202
Fax:(571) 273-8202
jay.flowers@uspto.gov
TEAS PLUS APPLICANTS MUST SUBMIT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY OR SUBMIT FEE: TEAS Plus applicants should submit the following documents using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html: (1) written responses to Office actions; (2) preliminary amendments; (3) changes of correspondence address; (4) changes of owner’s address; (5) appointments and revocations of attorney; (6) amendments to allege use; (7) statements of use; (8) requests for extension of time to file a statement of use, and (9) requests to delete a §1(b) basis. If any of these documents are filed on paper, they must be accompanied by a $50 per class fee. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iv) and 2.23(a)(i). Telephone responses will not incur an additional fee. NOTE: In addition to the above, applicant must also continue to accept correspondence from the Office via e-mail throughout the examination process in order to avoid the additional fee. 37 C.F.R. §2.23(a)(2).
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.