RS-FLEX
Dematic Corp.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77458338 |
| Registration Number | 3694682 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Marcy L. Sperry |
| Attorney Docket Number | D71948 3011 |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | LITZAU, MICHAEL |
Timeline
| 2007-01-21 | Date of First Use |
| 2008-04-25 | Application Filed |
| 2009-07-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 2009-10-13 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2009-10-13 | Trademark Registered |
| 2016-05-20 | Cancelled |
| 2016-05-20 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Dematic Corp. |
| Address | 507 Plymouth Avenue, NE Grand Rapids DE 495056098 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | computer software for interfacing with a material handling sortation control system |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2008-04-29 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2008-04-30 | 2 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-08-11 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-08-23 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2008-08-25 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2009-02-17 | 6 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-02-18 | 7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-02-18 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2009-02-18 | 9 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2009-02-19 | 10 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2009-02-19 | 11 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2009-06-08 | 12 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-06-15 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2009-06-15 | 14 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-06-16 | 15 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-06-20 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2009-07-08 | 17 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2009-07-28 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-10-13 | 19 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2011-07-07 | 20 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2011-07-07 | 21 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2015-01-21 | 22 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2015-01-21 | 23 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2016-05-20 | 24 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 