To: | Syfact International B.V. (efiling@grr.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77450665 - INVESTIGATOR - 5617/002 |
Sent: | 8/8/2008 2:48:14 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM103@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/450665
MARK: INVESTIGATOR
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Syfact International B.V.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/8/2008
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Trademark Act Section 2(d) Search Results – No Conflicting Marks Found
However, applicant must address the following issues:
Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) Refusal – Applicant’s Mark is Merely Descriptive
In the instant case, applicant seeks registration of “INVESTIGATOR” for “Computer software and programs for use by financial institutions, insurance companies and wholesale and retail businesses in detecting, tracking and monitoring financial crimes, fraud and money laundering” in International Class 009.
The term INVESTIGATOR is defined as “one who investigates” (see attached dictionary definitions of investigator and investigate). The purpose of applicant’s goods, namely, computer software programs, is to make a detailed inquiry or systematic examination into (or “investigate”) financial crimes, fraud, and money laundering, acting as an investigator.
For the reasons discussed above, applicant’s mark is refused registration on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1). Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
Applicant May Amend the Application to Seek Registration on the Supplemental Register
See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(d), 1091, 1094; TMEP §815.
Response
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/Laurie R. Kaufman/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 103
Phone: 571.272.8913
Fax: 571.273.8913
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.