To: | Bridgewater Associates, Inc. (NYCTrademarks@bakernet.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77415981 - RISK BUDGET TOOL - 56183232-2 |
Sent: | 6/22/2008 3:35:35 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM106@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/415981
MARK: RISK BUDGET TOOL
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Bridgewater Associates, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/22/2008
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
The Office records have been searched and there are no similar registered or pending marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
Section 2(e)(1) Refusal: Merely Descriptive
Applicant seeks registration for RISK BUDGET TOOL for providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in management of financial investment portfolios. According to the specimen of record, applicant’s software provides users the ability to input financial information and balance out the financial risks of investments that users make according to their budgets. The phrase “risk budget” and “risk budget tool” is used frequently in the financial industry to refer to calculations that financial investors use to balance out risks, assets, and liabilities. The term “tool” is frequently used to refer to software programs. Please see attached evidence. The proposed mark, RISK BUDGET TOOL, merely describes the intended use of applicant’s online software because it immediately informs consumers that applicants software tools are used to develop a risk budget financial analysis. Therefore, registration must be refused under Section 2(e)(1).
Supplemental Register
If applicant files an acceptable allegation of use and also amends to the Supplemental Register, the effective filing date of the application will be the date on which applicant met the minimum filing requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.76(e) for the amendment to allege use. 37 C.F.R. §2.75(b); TMEP §§816.02, 1102.03.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(d), 1091, 1094; TMEP §815.
The following must be submitted in an amendment to allege use in order to amend an application to use in commerce under Section 1(a):
(1) The following statement: “Applicant is believed to be the owner of the mark and that the mark is in use in commerce;”
(2) The date of first use of the mark anywhere on or in connection with the goods and/or services;
(3) The date of first use of the mark in commerce as a trademark or service mark;
(4) A specimen showing actual use of the mark in commerce for each class of goods and/or services for which use is being asserted. If a single specimen supports multiple classes, applicant should indicate which classes the specimen supports rather than providing multiple copies of the same specimen;
(5) A filing fee of $100 per class for each international class of goods and/or services for which use is being asserted (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov); and
(6) Verification of the above (1) through (3) requirements in an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33.
See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(2), 2.56, 2.76(b); TMEP §§1104.08, 1104.09(e).
Amendments to allege use can be filed online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.
Response Guidelines
There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action. The Office recommends applicants use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to respond to Office actions online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html. However, if applicant responds on paper via regular mail, the response should include the title “Response to Office Action” and the following information: (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney, (2) the serial number and filing date of the application, (3) the mailing date of this Office action, (4) applicant’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if applicable), and (5) the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.194(b)(1); TMEP §302.03(a).
The response should address each refusal and/or requirement raised in the Office action. If a refusal has issued, applicant can argue against the refusal; i.e., applicant can submit arguments and evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. To respond to requirements, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them into the application record.
The response must be personally signed or the electronic signature manually entered by applicant or someone with legal authority to bind applicant (i.e., a corporate officer of a corporate applicant, the equivalent of an officer for unincorporated organizations or limited liability company applicants, a general partner of a partnership applicant, each applicant for applications with multiple individual applicants). TMEP §§605.02, 712.
The following legal authorities govern the processing of trademark and service mark applications by the Office: The Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§1051 et seq.; The Trademark Rules of Practice, 37 C.F.R. Part 2; and the Office’s Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) (5th ed. 2007). These legal resources are available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm.
“TMEP” refers to the Office’s Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (5th ed. 2007), available on the United States Patent and Trademark Office website at www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm. The TMEP is a detailed administrative manual written by the Office to explain the laws and procedures that govern the trademark/service mark application, registration and post registration processes.
/Dannean J Hetzel/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 106
Phone 571-272-8858
Fax 571-273-9106
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.