To: | Mars, Incorporated (nyipdocket@arentfox.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77407715 - DOVE - N/A |
Sent: | 11/8/2010 4:30:53 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM103@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 77407715
MARK: DOVE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
|
APPLICANT: Mars, Incorporated
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/8/2010
THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on October 13, 2010.
Mark Differs on Drawing and Specimen-not material
A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services specified in the statement of use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 1109.09(b). The mark on the drawing must be a substantially exact representation of the mark as used on the specimen. 37 C.F.R. §2.51(b); TMEP §807.12(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b)(1). In addition, the drawing of the mark can be amended only if the amendment does not materially alter the mark as originally filed. 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2), (b)(2); see TMEP §§807.12(a), 807.14 et seq.
Therefore, applicant must submit one of the following:
(1) A new color drawing of the mark that agrees with the colors and placement of the mark on the specimen and does not materially alter the original mark. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §§807.07(d)(i), 807.13(a), 807.14 et seq. Amending the drawing to agree with the specimen would not be considered a material alteration of the mark in this case. NOTE that the present amended color description/claim appear to match the colors in the specimen of use See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(d)(i).;
(2) A new black and white drawing of the mark showing proper placement of the mark, with a statement authorizing the deletion of any color claim or color description. Amending the drawing to agree with the specimen would not be considered a material alteration of the mark in this case. See TMEP §807.07(a)(i), (d)(i).; or
(3) A substitute specimen showing use in commerce of the mark in the colors and with the placement depicted on the drawing, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.” See 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(b)(2), 2.193(e)(1); TMEP §§807.07(d)(i), 904.05. If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. In this case, applicant would need to amend the color claim/description to match the drawing of record. The drawing, color claim, color location description and specimen must all match. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.
Accordingly, the refusal of registration because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark and/or service mark is continued and made final. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). Note that applicant may not withdraw the statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.
Declaration Information
If applicant experiences difficulty in submitting the required substitute specimen, supporting statement and/or declaration, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov for technical assistance regarding the TEAS response form.
Options-Proper response to final office action
(1) Submitting a response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements, if feasible; and/or
(2) Filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with an appeal fee of $100 per class.
37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(18), 2.64(a); TBMP ch. 1200; TMEP §714.04.
In certain rare circumstances, a petition to the Director may be filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review a final Office action that is limited to procedural issues. 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters). The petition fee is $100. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).
Rebecca L. Gilbert
/Rebecca L. Gilbert/
Law Office 103
571-272-9431
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form at http://teasroa.gov.uspto.report/roa/. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen. If TARR shows no change for more than six months, call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.