CETAPHIL
Galderma, S.A.
The mark consists of overlapping ellipses over which the literal element "Cetaphil" is superimposed.
Mark For: CETAPHIL® trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
>Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of overlapping ellipses over which the literal element "Cetaphil" is superimposed.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77378145 |
| Registration Number | 3653157 |
| Mark Literal Elements | CETAPHIL |
| Mark Drawing Type | 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S)/NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION 2009-07-14 |
| Basis | 1(a) |
| Class Status | SECTION 8 - CANCEL |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | Yes |
| Current Use | Yes |
| Intent To Use | No |
| Filed ITU | No |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | G. Mathew Lombard |
| Attorney Name | G. Mathew Lombard |
| Attorney Docket Number | 102.0590 |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAE |
Timeline
| 2007-09-30 | Date of First Use |
| 2007-09-30 | Date of Use In Commerce |
| 2008-01-23 | Application Filed |
| 2009-04-28 | Published |
| 2009-04-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 2009-07-14 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2009-07-14 | Trademark Registered |
| 2016-02-19 | Cancelled |
| 2016-02-19 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2016-02-19 | Status: Registration cancelled because registrant did not file an acceptable declaration under Section 8. To view all documents in this |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Galderma, S.A. |
| Address | Zugerstrasse 8 Cham SWITZERLAND CH-6330 |
| Legal Entity Type | SociÉtÉ Anonyme (sa) |
| Legal Entity State | SWITZERLAND |
Documents
 Application | MULTI | 2008-01-23 |
 Drawing | JPEG | 2008-01-23 |
| Specimen | JPEG | 2008-01-23 |
| Design Search Code Corr Project | XML | 2008-01-29 |
| XSearch Search Summary | XML | 2008-03-11 |
| Offc Action Outgoing | MULTI | 2008-03-18 |
| Amended Drawing | JPEG | 2008-07-21 |
| Drawing | JPEG | 2008-07-21 |
| Response to Office Action | MULTI | 2008-07-21 |
| Amendment and Mail Process Complete | MULTI | 2008-07-23 |
| Offc Action Outgoing | XML | 2008-08-12 |
| TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA | MULTI | 2009-02-11 |
| Amendment and Mail Process Complete | MULTI | 2009-02-13 |
| Notation to File | XML | 2009-03-20 |
| TRAM Snapshot of App at Pub for Oppostn | MULTI | 2009-03-21 |
| Publication & Issue Review Complete | MULTI | 2009-03-24 |
| Notice of Publication | XML | 2009-04-08 |
| Registration Certificate | TIFF | 2009-07-14 |
| Change of Address | XML | 2010-12-23 |
| Change of Address | XML | 2014-12-29 |
Design Search Codes
| 26.03.21 | Ovals that are completely or partially shaded |
| 26.03.28 | Miscellaneous designs with overall oval shape, including amoeba |
| 260316 | Ovals touching or intersecting |
| 260321 | Ovals that are completely or partially shaded |
| 260328 | Miscellaneous designs with overall oval shape, including amoeba |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(CANCELLED)
IC 003. US 001 004 006 050 051 052. G & S: Cosmetics and skin care preparations, namely, face, hand and body soaps, cleansers and moisturizers; hair shampoos and conditioners; sunblocks and sunscreens. FIRST USE: 20070930. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20070930
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2016-02-19 | |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2014-12-29 | |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2010-12-23 | |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-07-14 | |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2009-04-28 | |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2009-04-08 | |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-03-23 | 66213 |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-03-20 | |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-02-12 | 66213 |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-02-12 | 66213 |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2009-02-11 | |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2009-02-11 | 378145 |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2009-02-11 | |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2009-02-11 | 378145 |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2008-08-12 | |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2008-08-12 | 81097 |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2008-08-12 | |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-07-22 | 88889 |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-07-22 | 66213 |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-07-21 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-07-21 | 88889 |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-03-18 | 6325 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-03-18 | 81097 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-03-18 | 6325 |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-03-11 | 81097 |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2008-01-29 | |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2008-01-28 |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 