CAESARS LUXURY COLLECTION

Caesars World, Inc.

Application Filed: 2007-07-25

Trademark Application Details

Status

604

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - AFTER INTER-PARTES DECISION

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	77237918
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Law Office Assigned	L30
Employee Name	SPARACINO, MARK V

Timeline

2007-02-27	Date of First Use
2007-07-25	Application Filed
2008-03-25	Published for Opposition
2010-08-09	Abandon
2010-08-09	Location: TTAB
2010-08-09	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Caesars World, Inc.
Address	Tyler/Law One Harrah's Court Las Vegas FL 89119
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	FL

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

JESSICA E. JACOB
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
ONE ATLANTIC CENTER 1201 WEST PEACHTREE
STREET
ATLANTA, GA 30309-3424

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	35
U.S. Codes:	100,101,102

Type Code	Type
D10000	"LUXURY COLLECTION"

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2007-07-30	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2007-10-30	2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2007-11-01	3 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2007-11-01	4 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2007-11-01	5 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2007-11-02	6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2007-11-02	7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2007-11-03	8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	2007-11-18	9 CNFR R:Renewal
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	2007-11-18	10 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	2007-11-18	11 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	2008-01-15	12 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2008-01-15	13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2008-01-16	14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2008-01-17	15 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2008-02-19	16 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2008-02-19	17 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	2008-02-20	18 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2008-03-05	19 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2008-03-25	20 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	2008-04-21	21 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	2008-07-22	22 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	2008-12-31	23 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence
OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999	2010-08-09	24 OP.D T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999	2010-08-09	25 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION	2010-08-09	26 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION	2010-08-09	27 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.