To: | E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (dupont.trademarks@usa.dupont.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77231061 - DUPONT - N/A |
Sent: | 10/3/2007 2:18:57 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM115@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/231061
MARK: DUPONT
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 10/3/2007
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:
Search Results
The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
Section 2(f) Claim Needs Clarification
Applicant states that the applied-for mark has acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act “as evidenced by the ownership on the Principal Register for the same mark for related goods or services of U.S. Registration No(s). 0823651[,] 9398183 [and] 2562399.” However, Registration No. 9398183 does not exist, and Registration No. 2562399 does not appeared to be owned by applicant, but rather it is owned by Emhart, Inc., a corporation of Delaware. Applicant should clarify the Section 2(f) statement, or amend the claim to base the 2(f) claim on Registration No. 0823651 only.
Applicant claims ownership of U.S. Registration No. 0309193, however, no such registration exists. Applicant’s claim of ownership of U.S. Registration No. 2562300 will not be printed on any registration that may issue from this application because the marks are different. Only prior registrations for the same or similar marks are considered related registrations for purposes of an ownership claim. 37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812. Applicant should amend or clarify its claim of prior registration.
In all correspondence to the Patent and Trademark Office, the applicant should list the name and law office of the examining attorney, the serial number of this application, the mailing date of this Office action, and the applicant's telephone number.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office Action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Matt Einstein/
Matt Einstein
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 115
phone: (571) 272-8251
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: If there are any questions about the Office action, please contact the assigned examining attorney. A response to this Office action should be filed using the form available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm. If notification of this Office action was received via e-mail, no response using this form may be filed for 72 hours after receipt of the notification. Do not attempt to respond by e-mail as the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.