To: | Mathews Brothers Company (sjordan@dwmlaw.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77230349 - WOW! - N/A |
Sent: | 7/31/2008 2:00:39 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM107@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/230349
MARK: WOW!
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Mathews Brothers Company
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 7/31/2008
THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on July 18, 2008. Following careful consideration of the entire submission and re-review of the application, the examining attorney concludes as follows:
In the first Office Action dated November 7, 2007, applicant was issued a refusal conditional on a proper specimen and was required to amend the identification of services.
The following requirement(s) has been satisfied: requirement to amend the identification of services. TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.
While applicant’s response includes multiple substitute specimens, they are not sufficient to overcome the refusal. Therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the specimen refusal now made FINAL. See Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, 3 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1053 and 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv) and 2.56; TMEP §§904 and 1301.04.
Specimen Refusal
In this case, the specimens consist of, as indicated by applicant on Page 7 of its incoming response dated July 18, 2008: 1) copies of pages of Applicant’s website; 2) the introductory page of Applicant’s company brochure provided to customers and potential customers; 3) a poster or placard which describes to customers how the services described in the application are rendered using the “WOW!” approach; and 4) a recognition card which is used by staff members and wholesale and retail customers of the Applicant in connection with the retail and wholesale services performed by the Applicant.
The following pages refer to pages from applicant’s incoming response dated July 18, 2008:
Page 9: Though applicant’s mark is included on this website page, no reference is made to the applicant’s applied-for retail services.
Page 10: Specimen fails to show applicant’s mark.
Page 11: Specimen fails to show applicant’s mark.
Page 12: Specimen fails to show applicant’s mark.
Page 13: Though applicant’s mark is included on this website page, no connection is made between the applicant’s mark and the applied-for retail services.
Page 14: Though applicant’s mark is included on this website page, no reference is made to the applicant’s applied-for retail services.
Page 15: Though applicant’s mark is included on this website page, no reference is made to the applicant’s applied-for retail services.
Therefore, applicant must submit the following:
(1) A substitute specimen showing use of the mark for each class of goods and/or services specified in the application; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05. If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c).
Examples of specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services. TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.
If applicant cannot satisfy the above requirements, applicant may amend the Section 1(a) filing basis (use in commerce) to Section 1(b) (intent to use basis), for which no specimen is required. However, should applicant amend the basis to Section 1(b), registration cannot be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen. 15 U.S.C. §1051(c); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP Chapter 1100.
In order to amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the filing date of the application.” 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(2), 2.35(b)(1); TMEP §806.03(c).
Pending a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark or service mark for the identified goods or services. 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
Sample Declaration
Should the applicant’s response require verification, please note the following.
_____________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
_____________________________
(Date)
Proper Response to Final Office Action
If applicant does not respond within six months of the mailing date of this final Office action, the application will be abandoned. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a). Applicant may respond to this final Office action by:
(1) Submitting a response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements, if feasible; and/or
(2) Filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with an appeal fee of $100 per class.
37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(18), 2.64(a); TBMP ch. 1200; TMEP §714.04.
In certain rare circumstances, a petition to the Director may be filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review a final Office action that is limited to procedural issues. 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters). The petition fee is $100. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).
Assistance
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/James W. Stein/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 107
Phone No. (571) 272-3056
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.