RENEW
Dshealthcare Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77164873 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Thomas P. Arden |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | BESCH, JAY C |
Timeline
| 2007-04-25 | Application Filed |
| 2008-08-27 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2008-09-12 | Abandon |
| 2008-09-15 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  DSHEALTHCARE INC. |
| Address | 221 W PHILADELPHIA ST YORK DE 17401 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | Remineralizing and desensitizing toothpaste available by prescription |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2007-04-30 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2007-07-23 | 2 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-08-08 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2007-08-09 | 4 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2007-08-09 | 5 GNSL F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2007-08-09 | 6 GNS3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2008-02-06 | 7 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2008-02-06 | 8 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-02-09 | 9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2008-02-09 | 10 RCCK S: |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2008-02-13 | 11 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-02-29 | 12 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-02-29 | 13 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-02-29 | 14 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-08-06 | 15 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-08-06 | 16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-08-06 | 17 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2008-08-06 | 18 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2008-08-06 | 19 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2008-08-27 | 20 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2008-08-27 | 21 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2008-08-27 | 22 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | 2008-09-12 | 23 EXAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | 2008-09-15 | 24 ABN1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | 2008-09-15 | 25 MAB1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 