| PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
| OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Response to Office Action
The table below presents the data as entered.
Input Field
|
Entered
|
| SERIAL NUMBER |
77132789 |
| LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED |
LAW OFFICE 112 |
| MARK SECTION (no change) |
| ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION |
| DISCLAIMER |
"No claim is made to the exclusive right to use "UNDER EYE" for goods identified as "foundation, concealer, pressed powder, mascara, eye
liner, eye pencils, skin moisturizers and lotions, skin cleansing creams and lotions, toner, and astringents for cosmetic purposes" apart from the mark as shown." |
| PRIOR REGISTRATION(S) |
"Applicant claims ownership of U.S. Registration Number(s) 2782834." |
| SIGNATURE SECTION |
| DECLARATION SIGNATURE |
The filing Attorney has elected not to submit the signed declaration, believing no supporting declaration is required under the Trademark
Rules of Practice. |
| RESPONSE SIGNATURE |
/ThomasWalsh/ |
| SIGNATORY'S NAME |
Thomas Walsh |
| SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
Legal Counsel |
| DATE SIGNED |
11/21/2007 |
| AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY |
YES |
| FILING INFORMATION SECTION |
| SUBMIT DATE |
Wed Nov 21 17:24:31 EST 2007 |
| TEAS STAMP |
USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.X-2
0071121172431263364-77132
789-4107c5d9e1656024d712c
8662fd51cf9b-N/A-N/A-2007
1121163213729489 |
| PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
| OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Response to Office Action
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no.
77132789 has been amended as follows:
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Disclaimer
"No claim is made to the exclusive right to use "UNDER EYE" for goods identified as "foundation, concealer, pressed powder, mascara, eye liner, eye pencils, skin moisturizers and lotions, skin
cleansing creams and lotions, toner, and astringents for cosmetic purposes" apart from the mark as shown."
Claim of Prior Registration(s)
"Applicant claims ownership of U.S. Registration Number(s) 2782834."
SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature
I hereby elect to bypass the submission of a signed declaration, because I believe a declaration is not required by the rules of practice. I understand that the examining attorney could still, upon
later review, require a signed declaration.
Response Signature
Signature: /ThomasWalsh/ Date: 11/21/2007
Signatory's Name: Thomas Walsh
Signatory's Position: Legal Counsel
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and
other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.
attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a
signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney
appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this
matter.
Serial Number: 77132789
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Nov 21 17:24:31 EST 2007
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.X-2007112117243126
3364-77132789-4107c5d9e1656024d712c8662f
d51cf9b-N/A-N/A-20071121163213729489