To: | Green Imaging Technologies Inc. (jack@smugler.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77113488 - GIT-CAP - 6563/05 |
Sent: | 6/11/2007 4:12:39 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM109@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/113488
MARK: GIT-CAP
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Green Imaging Technologies Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/11/2007
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
A. No Conflicting Marks Found
The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
B. Applicant may proceed solely on the ITU Basis
The application specifies both intent to use under Section 1(b) and a claim of priority under Section 44(d) based on a foreign application. 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b) and 1126(d). When an application is filed pursuant to Section 44(d), the USPTO presumes, unless otherwise indicated, that applicant intends to rely upon the resulting foreign registration as a basis for registration in the U.S. TMEP §§806.02(f) and 1003.03.
However, applicant may rely solely on intent to use as the basis for registration, and still claim the benefit of the priority filing date. If applicant wants to rely on intent to use as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority, applicant should submit an amendment so advising the undersigned. Once all other outstanding issues are resolved, the mark would be approved for publication without requiring a copy of the foreign registration. TMEP §§806.02(f) and 806.04(b). However, while the mark may be approved for publication, it will not register until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.
If applicant does not indicate otherwise, the USPTO will presume that applicant is relying on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration. Thus, the application will not be approved for publication until a copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation signed by the translator, have been filed. TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).
C. Response Guidelines
Please note, there is no required format or form for responding to this Office action. The Office recommends applicants use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to respond to Office actions online at <http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html>. However, if applicant responds on paper via regular mail, the response should include the following information: (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney; (2) the serial number of this application; (3) the mailing date of this Office action; and, (4) applicant's telephone number.
When responding to this Office action, applicant must make sure to respond to each refusal and requirement raised. If there is a refusal to register the proposed mark, then applicant may wish to argue against the refusal, i.e., submit arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and why the mark should register. If there are other requirements, then applicant should simply set forth in writing the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them into the application record. Applicant must also sign and date its response.
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/William Rossman/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 109
William.Rossman@USPTO.Gov
(571) 272- 9029
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: If there are any questions about the Office action, please contact the assigned examining attorney. A response to this Office Action should be filed using the Office’s Response to Office action form available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm. If notification of this Office action was received via e-mail, no response using this form may be filed for 72 hours after receipt of the notification. Do not attempt to respond by e-mail as the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.