Offc Action Outgoing

STUDEBAKER

John A. Seaton

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77106299 - STUDEBAKER - 043639.005

To: John A. Seaton (hhanegan@sgrlaw.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77106299 - STUDEBAKER - 043639.005
Sent: 6/6/2007 11:29:12 AM
Sent As: ECOM103@USPTO.GOV
Attachments: Attachment - 1
Attachment - 2
Attachment - 3
Attachment - 4
Attachment - 5
Attachment - 6
Attachment - 7
Attachment - 8
Attachment - 9
Attachment - 10
Attachment - 11
Attachment - 12
Attachment - 13
Attachment - 14
Attachment - 15
Attachment - 16

[Important Email Information]

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           77/106299

 

    APPLICANT:         John A. Seaton

 

 

        

*77106299*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  HERBERT M. HANEGAN, ESQ.

  SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP

  1230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.

  SUITE 3100, PROMENADE II

  ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       STUDEBAKER

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   043639.005

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 hhanegan@sgrlaw.com

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  77/106299

 

TEAS PLUS APPLICANTS MUST SUBMIT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY OR SUBMIT FEE:  TEAS Plus applicants should submit the following documents using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html:  (1) written responses to Office actions; (2) preliminary amendments; (3) changes of correspondence address; (4) changes of owner’s address; (5) appointments and revocations of attorney; (6) amendments to allege use; (7) statements of use; (8) requests for extension of time to file a statement of use, and (9) requests to delete a §1(b) basis.  If any of these documents are filed on paper, they must be accompanied by a $50 per class fee.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iv) and 2.23(a)(i).  Telephone responses will not incur an additional fee.  NOTE:  In addition to the above, applicant must also continue to accept correspondence from the Office via e-mail throughout the examination process in order to avoid the additional fee.  37 C.F.R. §2.23(a)(2).

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

 

No Conflicting Marks

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

Mark Is Primarily Merely a Surname

The examining attorney refuses registration on the Principal Register because the mark is primarily merely a surname.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); TMEP §1211.

 

The examining attorney must consider the primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public to determine whether a term is primarily merely a surname.  In re Kahan & Weisz Jewelry Mfg. Corp., 508 F.2d 831, 184 USPQ 421 (CCPA 1975).  The rarity of a surname does not per se preclude a finding that a term is primarily merely a surname.  Even a rare surname may be held primarily merely a surname if the use of the surname on the goods would be perceived as arbitrary or fanciful.  In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 222 USPQ 260, 262 (TTAB 1984), aff'd, 759 F.2d 15, 225 USPQ 652 (Fed. Cir. 1985); Ex parte Rivera Watch Corp., 106 USPQ 145, 149 (Comm'r Pats. 1955); In re Industrie Pirelli, 9 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (TTAB 1988).

 

The applicant applied to register the mark STUDEBAKER for belts made of leather.  Registration is refused because the primary significance of “Studebaker” is that of a surname.  See attached excerpted webpage showing the frequency of the name throughout the country; attached excerpted webpage showing the known individual who made automobile; attached excerpted stories from the examining attorney’s search on a computerized database.

 

That “Studebaker” is a surname of people located in the United States shows that consumers have been exposed to it, and will regard it as a surname.

 

Supplemental Register

Applicant may choose to proceed upon the Supplemental Register.  However, an application under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), is not eligible for registration on the Supplemental Register until an acceptable amendment to allege use under 37 C.F.R. §2.76 or statement of use under 37 C.F.R. §2.88 has been timely filed.  37 C.F.R. §2.47(c); TMEP §815.02, 816.02 and 1102.03.  When such an application is changed from the Principal Register to the Supplemental Register, the effective filing date of the application is the date of filing of the allegation of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.75(b); TMEP §§206.01 and 816.02.

 

Other Issues

Although the examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.  If the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond to the following issues.

 

Living Individual / Consent

The applicant must indicate if “Studebaker” represents a particular living individual.  TMEP§813.  If it does, then the applicant must submit the written consent of “Studebaker.”  If it does not, then the applicant must submit a statement to this effect.

 

Response Guidelines

In all correspondence to the Patent and Trademark Office, the applicant should list the name and law office of the examining attorney, the serial number of this application, the mailing date of this Office action, and the applicant's telephone number.  No set form is required for response to this Office action.  The applicant must respond to each point raised.  The applicant should simply set forth the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them.  The applicant must sign the response.

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

/V.J./

Gene V.J. Maciol, II

Trademark Attorney Advisor

Law Office 103

571 272 9280

571 273 9280 fax

 

 

 

NOTICE OF NEW PROCEDURE FOR E-MAILED OFFICE ACTIONS:  In late spring 2007, for any applicant who authorizes e-mail communication with the USPTO, the USPTO will no longer directly e-mail the actual Office action to the applicant.  Instead, upon issuance of an Office action, the USPTO will e-mail the applicant a notice with a link/web address to access the Office action using Trademark Document Retrieval (TDR), which is located on the USPTO website at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.  The Office action will not be attached to the e-mail notice.  Upon receipt of the notice, the applicant can then view and print the actual Office action and any evidentiary attachments using the provided link/web address.  TDR is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, including holidays and weekends.  This new process is intended to eliminate problems associated with e-mailed Office actions that contain numerous attachments.

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.  NOTE:  Do not respond by e-mail.  THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining attorney’s name.  NOTE:  The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the Office, not the postmarked date.  To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.  37 C.F.R. §2.197.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.

 


 

Note:

 

In order to avoid size limitation constraints on large e-mail messages, this Office Action has been split into 2 smaller e-mail messages.  The Office Action in its entirety consists of this message as well as the following attachments that you will receive in separate messages:

 

Email 1 includes the following 8 attachments  

1. person-1  

2. person-2  

3. eg1-1  

4. eg1-2  

5. eg1-3  

6. eg2-1  

7. eg2-2  

8. eg2-3  

 

Email 2 includes the following 8 attachments  

1. eg3-1  

2. eg3-2  

3. eg3-3  

4. nexisbylin-1  

5. nexisbylin-2  

6. exis2-1  

7. exis2-2  

8. exis2-3  

 

Please ensure that you receive all of the aforementioned attachments, and if you do not, please contact the assigned-examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed