PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Response to Office Action
The table below presents the data as entered.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Response to Office Action
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no.
77092676 has been amended as follows:
ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
Please see the actual argument text attached within the Evidence section.
EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Exhibit 1: Tortilla definition; Exhibit 2: Sandwich definition; Exhibit 3: Article from Boston.com (The Boston Globe); Exhibit 4: Delicatessen definition; Exhibit 5: Google
search; Exhibit 6-9: Electronic records of PTO; Exhibit 10: Article from the Press Democrat; Exhibit 11:Electronic records of PTO; Exhibit 12: SONOMA product information has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._SONOMA_response.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex1.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex2.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex3.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (5 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex4.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex5.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (11 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Evidence-7
Evidence-8
Evidence-9
Evidence-10
Evidence-11
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex6.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (6 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex7.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (6 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex8.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (5 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex9.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (6 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex10.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex11.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (36 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Evidence-7
Evidence-8
Evidence-9
Evidence-10
Evidence-11
Evidence-12
Evidence-13
Evidence-14
Evidence-15
Evidence-16
Evidence-17
Evidence-18
Evidence-19
Evidence-20
Evidence-21
Evidence-22
Evidence-23
Evidence-24
Evidence-25
Evidence-26
Evidence-27
Evidence-28
Evidence-29
Evidence-30
Evidence-31
Evidence-32
Evidence-33
Evidence-34
Evidence-35
Evidence-36
Original PDF file:
evi_641428265-181112788_._sonoma_ex12.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES
Applicant proposes to amend the following class of goods/services in the application:
Current: Class 030 for A line of tortillas and sandwich wraps
Original Filing Basis:
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection
with the identified goods and/or services as of the filing date of the application. (15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b)).
Proposed: Class 030 for Tortillas and wraps
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection
with the identified goods and/or services as of the filing date of the application. (15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b)).
SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature
I hereby elect to bypass the submission of a signed declaration, because I believe a declaration is not required by the rules of practice. I understand that the examining attorney could still, upon
later review, require a signed declaration.
Response Signature
Signature: /William J. Arnone, Jr./ Date: 11/16/2007
Signatory's Name: William J. Arnone, Jr.
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and
other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.
attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a
signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney
appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this
matter.
Serial Number: 77092676
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Nov 16 18:35:03 EST 2007
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XX-20071116183503214
171-77092676-410f8aecef057167dcf3910452d
e7a53e-N/A-N/A-20071116181112788688