SWIFT BANK

Swift Financial Corporation

Application Filed: 2007-01-22

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	77087975
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Attorney Name	Andrew Baum
Law Office Assigned	L20
Employee Name	BAKER, JORDAN A

Timeline

2007-01-22	Application Filed
2008-02-05	Published for Opposition
2009-03-31	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2009-11-02	Abandon
2009-11-02	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Swift Financial Corporation
Address	409 Silverside Road, Suite 100 Wilmington DE 19809
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	DE

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

Andrew Baum
Foley & Lardner LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York NY 10016

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	36
U.S. Codes:	100,101,102

Type Code	Type
D10000	"BANK"

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2007-01-25	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2007-05-09	2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2007-05-10	3 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2007-05-10	4 GNRT F:First Action
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2007-11-09	5 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2007-11-09	6 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2007-11-13	7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2007-11-13	8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2007-11-14	9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2007-11-15	10 CNSA P:
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2008-01-02	11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2008-01-02	12 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2008-01-16	13 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2008-02-05	14 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	2008-03-03	15 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2008-06-24	16 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2008-06-24	17 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED	2008-08-19	18 ETOP T:TTAB Proceeding
TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED	2008-08-22	19 EPPA I:Incoming Correspondence
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2008-09-30	20 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	2008-10-06	21 APET A:Allowance for Publication
CHANGES/CORRECTIONS AFTER PUB APPROVAL ENTERED	2008-10-07	22 CHPB I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2009-03-12	23 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	2009-03-31	24 AITU A:Allowance for Publication
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2009-03-12	25 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2009-04-01	26 EX1G S:
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2009-11-02	27 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2009-11-02	28 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.