PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 77067666 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 101 |
MARK SECTION (no change) | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
Applicant has submitted specimens consisting of a screenprint from Applicant’s website, and a photo of signage outside of Applicant’s facility where the goods are created. Applicant believes that the specimens of record are sufficient to demonstrate use with Applicant’s class 004 goods.
Applicant sells its goods in bulk quantities. As such, it is not feasible for Applicant to affix a label, tag, etc. to the goods. Applicant believes the specimens submitted paint a clear and realistic picture as to the marriage between Applicant’s promotion of the mark (i.e. specimens) and its goods. Applicant submits that these specimens demonstrate use of the mark on or in connection with the goods. See TMEP § 904.04 ("The office may accept another document related to the goods or the sale of the goods when it is not possible to place the mark on the goods, packaging, or displays associated with the goods. This provision is not intended as a general alternative to submitting labels, tags, containers or displays associated with the goods; it applies only to situations where the nature of the goods makes use on them impractical. . . . For example, it may be impractical to place the mark on the goods or packaging for the goods if the goods are natural gas, grain that is sold in bulk, or chemicals that are transported only in tanker cars.") (Emphasis added).
Applicant also points out that other applications filed contemporaneous with the Subject Mark, which contained identical specimens, have been approved for publication. More specifically, the marks “OTTER CREEK” (Serial No. 77/070139) and Otter Creek Ethanol & design (Serial No. 77070214) were published for opposition on August 28, 2007 and August 14, 2007, respectively. The USPTO is required to review all of the information in the record and not view the specimens in a vacuum. See In re Ancor Holdings, LLC and TMEP Section 1301.04.
In the alternative, Applicant is submitting a substitute specimen which consists of a bill of lading. This document depicts the Subject Mark, refer to the goods, and accompanies the same at the time of delivery.
In summary, Applicant believes the original specimens sufficiently depict the Subject Mark in commerce. In the alternative, the document above-referenced qualifies as a specimen pursuant to TMEP § 904.04. Either or both of these are acceptable specimens for Applicant’s goods. A Notice of Publication is respectfully solicited.
|
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 004 |
DESCRIPTION | Bio-fuels, namely, ethanol fuel |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 03/00/2004 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 03/00/2004 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 004 |
DESCRIPTION | Bio-fuels, namely, ethanol fuel |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 03/00/2004 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 03/00/2004 |
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application." |
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) |
\\TICRS2\EXPORT14\770\676 \77067666\xml1\ROA0002.JP G |
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | A bill of lading which accompanies the goods at the time of shipment |
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION | |
SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | "The applicant seeks registration of the mark on the Supplemental Register (i.e., a change of the words 'Principal Register' to 'Supplemental Register')." |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /troy leonard/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Troy Leonard |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record |
DATE SIGNED | 10/16/2007 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /troy leonard/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Troy Leonard |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record |
DATE SIGNED | 10/16/2007 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Tue Oct 16 15:19:24 EDT 2007 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XXX.XXX-2 0071016151924295323-77067 666-40085d1ed61ca13d7ddae 4b82c9ba1288-N/A-N/A-2007 1016144051262804 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Applicant has submitted specimens consisting of a screenprint from Applicant’s website, and a photo of signage outside of Applicant’s facility where the goods are created. Applicant believes that the specimens of record are sufficient to demonstrate use with Applicant’s class 004 goods.
Applicant sells its goods in bulk quantities. As such, it is not feasible for Applicant to affix a label, tag, etc. to the goods. Applicant believes the specimens submitted paint a clear and realistic picture as to the marriage between Applicant’s promotion of the mark (i.e. specimens) and its goods. Applicant submits that these specimens demonstrate use of the mark on or in connection with the goods. See TMEP § 904.04 ("The office may accept another document related to the goods or the sale of the goods when it is not possible to place the mark on the goods, packaging, or displays associated with the goods. This provision is not intended as a general alternative to submitting labels, tags, containers or displays associated with the goods; it applies only to situations where the nature of the goods makes use on them impractical. . . . For example, it may be impractical to place the mark on the goods or packaging for the goods if the goods are natural gas, grain that is sold in bulk, or chemicals that are transported only in tanker cars.") (Emphasis added).
Applicant also points out that other applications filed contemporaneous with the Subject Mark, which contained identical specimens, have been approved for publication. More specifically, the marks “OTTER CREEK” (Serial No. 77/070139) and Otter Creek Ethanol & design (Serial No. 77070214) were published for opposition on August 28, 2007 and August 14, 2007, respectively. The USPTO is required to review all of the information in the record and not view the specimens in a vacuum. See In re Ancor Holdings, LLC and TMEP Section 1301.04.
In the alternative, Applicant is submitting a substitute specimen which consists of a bill of lading. This document depicts the Subject Mark, refer to the goods, and accompanies the same at the time of delivery.
In summary, Applicant believes the original specimens sufficiently depict the Subject Mark in commerce. In the alternative, the document above-referenced qualifies as a specimen pursuant to TMEP § 904.04. Either or both of these are acceptable specimens for Applicant’s goods. A Notice of Publication is respectfully solicited.