To: | Virent Energy Systems, Inc. (tm-dept@quarles.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77011457 - BIOFORMING - 129550.00003 |
Sent: | 12/14/2007 1:47:22 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM104@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/011457
MARK: BIOFORMING
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Virent Energy Systems, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/14/2007
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the statement of use and has determined the following:
SPECIMENS UNACCEPTABLE – CLASS 1 AND 4
The specimen is not acceptable for International Classes 1 and 4 because it consists of advertising material for goods. Section 45 of the Trademark Act requires use “on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on tags or labels affixed thereto.” 15 U.S.C. §1127; see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1); TMEP §§904.04(b)-(c).
Material that functions merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is unacceptable to show trademark use. Indeed, invoices, business cards, announcements, price lists, listings in trade directories, order forms, bills of lading, leaflets, brochures, publicity releases, advertising circulars and other printed advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods. See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §§904.04(b)-(c).
A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods in the statement of use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56, 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1109.09(b).
Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting the following:
(1) A substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce each class of the goods specified in the statement of use; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed applicant for filing a statement of use.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05. If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c).
Examples of specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging, or displays associated with the goods at their point of sale. TMEP §§904.03 et seq.
Pending a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark for International Classes 1 and 4. 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56, 2.88; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1109.09(b).
Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.
DRAWING AND SPECIMENS DO NOT MATCH – CLASS 7, 9, AND 11
The mark depicted on the International Class 7, 9 and 11 specimens disagree with the mark on the drawing. In this case, the specimens display the mark as “HYDROGEN PRODUCED BY THE FORMING PROCESS,” while the drawing shows the mark as “BIOFORMING.”
The mark shown on the drawing must be a substantially exact representation of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods, as shown by the specimen. 37 C.F.R. §2.51(b); see C.F.R. §2.72(a)(1). However, applicant may not amend the drawing to conform to the display on the specimen because the essence or character of the mark would be materially altered; in other words, the mark on the specimen creates a different commercial impression from the mark on the drawing. 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §§807.14 et seq.
Therefore, applicant must submit the following:
(1) A substitute specimen showing the mark that appears on the drawing; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed applicant for filing a statement of use.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05. If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c).
Pending a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark for the identified goods in International Classes 7, 9, and 11. 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56, 2.88; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1109.09(b).
Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.
RESPONDING TO A PARTIAL REFUSAL
Applicant may respond to the stated refusal by doing one of the following:
(1) deleting the classes to which the refusals pertain;
(2) arguing against the refusal of the combined application as a whole; or
(3) filing a request to divide out the services that have not been refused registration, so that the mark may be published for opposition in the class to which the refusal does not pertain (See 37 C.F.R. §2.87 and TMEP §§1110.05 and 1403.03 regarding the requirements for filing a request to divide).
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/Jason Paul Blair/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 104
Phone - (571) 272-8856
Fax - (571) 273-8856
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: If there are any questions about the Office action, please contact the assigned examining attorney. A response to this Office action should be filed using the form available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm. If notification of this Office action was received via e-mail, no response using this form may be filed for 72 hours after receipt of the notification. Do not attempt to respond by e-mail as the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.