Offc Action Outgoing

BEST OF THE ROAD

RM ACQUISITION, LLC

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           77/010612

 

    APPLICANT:         Rand McNally & Company

 

 

        

*77010612*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  G. COURTNEY HOLOHAN

  KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

  200 E RANDOLPH ST STE 5300

  CHICAGO, IL 60601-6436

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       BEST OF THE ROAD

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   21872-114

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  77/010612

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

The applicant must respond to the following requirements.

 

 

 

 

PORTION OF TITLE OF SINGLE WORK REFUSAL

 

THIS REFUSAL APPLIES TO CLASS 16 ONLY.

 

Registration is refused because the proposed mark, as used on the specimen of record, is used only as a portion of a title of a single creative work, namely, a portion of a title of a specific book; it does not function as a trademark to identify and distinguish applicant’s goods from those of others and to indicate their source.  Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1052 and 1127; see In re Scholastic, Inc., 23 USPQ2d 1774 (TTAB 1992); TMEP §1202.08.  Single creative works include works in which the content does not change, whether that work is in printed, recorded or electronic form.

 

Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting evidence that the proposed mark (1) is used on a series of creative works, (2) creates a separate impression apart from the complete title, and (3) is promoted or recognized as a mark for the series.  See Scholastic, 23 USPQ2d at 1776-78. 

 

Evidence of a series includes copies or photographs of at least two different book covers or packaging for two different recorded books (not two copies of the same work).  Evidence that a portion of a title is promoted or recognized as a mark for a series includes advertising that promotes that portion of the title as the source of the series, third-party reviews showing use of that portion of the title by others to refer to the series, and/or declarations from publishers, retailers, purchasers or readers showing recognition of that portion of the title as an indicator of the source of a series of written works.  Id.

 

If applicant cannot satisfy the above evidentiary requirements, applicant may amend the Section 1(a) filing basis (use in commerce) to Section 1(b) (intent to use), and the refusal will be withdrawn.  However, should applicant amend the basis to Section 1(b), registration cannot be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use and submitting the evidence above.  15 U.S.C. §1051(c); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP Chapter 1100. 

 

In order to amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the filing date of the application.”  15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(2) and 2.35(b)(1); TMEP §806.01(b).

 

UNACCEPTABLE IDENTIFICATION

 

The wording “travel guide maps and atlases made available on-line” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is too broad and could include services in other international classes.  TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03.  Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: 

 

“Providing travel information on-line, namely, maps,” in International Class 39; and

 

“Providing non-downloadable on-line publications in the nature of atlases,” in International Class 41.

 

Please note that, while the identification of services may be amended to clarify or limit the services, adding to the services or broadening the scope of the services is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include services that are not within the scope of the services set forth in the present identification.

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the requirements below for those goods and/or services based on actual use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a):

 

(1)   Applicant must list the goods/services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order;

 

(2)   Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and/or services not covered by the fee already paid (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov); and

 

(3)   For each additional class of goods and/or services, applicant must submit:

 

(a)    dates of first use of the mark anywhere and dates of first use of the mark in commerce, or a statement that the dates of use in the initial application apply to that class; the dates of use, both anywhere and in commerce, must be at least as early as the filing date of the application;

 

(b)   one specimen showing use of the mark for each class of goods and/or services; the specimen must have been in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application;

 

(c)    a statement that “the specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application;” and

 

(d)   verification of the statements in 3(a) and 3(c) in an affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  (NOTE:  Verification is not required where (1) the dates of use for the added class are stated to be the same as the dates of use specified in the initial application, or (2) the original specimens are acceptable for the added class.)

 

37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.34(a), 2.59, 2.71(c), and 2.86(a); TMEP §§810, 904.09, 1403.01 and 1403.02(c).

 

Please note that the specimen(s) of record are acceptable for all suggested classes.

 

 

 

 

CLAIM OF PRIOR REGISTRATION UNNECESSARY

 

Applicant’s claim of ownership of U.S. Registration Nos. 0734948 and 1387417 will not be printed on any registration that may issue from this application because the marks are different.  Only prior registrations for the same or similar marks are considered related registrations for purposes of an ownership claim.  37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812.

 

If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office Action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below. 

 

 

 

 

/Napoleon K. Sharma/

Napoleon K. Sharma

Trademark Examining Attorney

Phone:  (571) 272-3387

Fax:      (571) 272-9107

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.  NOTE:  Do not respond by e-mail.  THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining attorney’s name.  NOTE:  The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the Office, not the postmarked date.  To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.  37 C.F.R. §2.197.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed