BUBBLE CHOCOLATE BUBBLES
Drab, Francis P.
Mark For: BUBBLE CHOCOLATE BUBBLES™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77004968 |
| Mark Literal Elements | BUBBLE CHOCOLATE BUBBLES |
| Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
| Mark Type | Trademark |
| Current Location | INTENT TO USE SECTION 2007-10-09 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN |
Timeline
| 2006-09-22 | Application Filed |
| 2007-07-17 | Published |
| 2007-07-17 | Published for Opposition |
| 2007-10-09 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2008-04-10 | Abandon |
| 2008-04-10 | Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume |
| 2008-04-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Drab, Francis P. |
| Address | 1407 Rydal Rd Rydal, PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES 19046 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Documents
 Drawing | JPEG | 2006-09-22 |
 TEAS Plus New Application | MULTI | 2006-09-22 |
| XSearch Search Summary | XML | 2007-02-12 |
| Offc Action Outgoing | XML | 2007-02-16 |
| Response to Office Action | MULTI | 2007-02-26 |
| Amendment and Mail Process Complete | MULTI | 2007-03-31 |
| Examiners Amendment | XML | 2007-05-02 |
| TRAM Snapshot of App at Pub for Oppostn | MULTI | 2007-05-03 |
| Amendment and Mail Process Complete | MULTI | 2007-05-04 |
| Publication & Issue Review Complete | MULTI | 2007-05-04 |
| Notice of Publication | XML | 2007-06-27 |
| Notice of Allowance | XML | 2007-10-09 |
| Notice of Abandonment | XML | 2008-06-10 |
| ITU Unit Action | MULTI | 2008-06-11 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 30 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "CHOCOLATE" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2008-06-10 | |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2008-06-10 | 48500 |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2007-10-09 | |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-07-17 | |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-06-27 | |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-05-03 | 76568 |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2007-05-02 | 6328 |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2007-05-02 | 73350 |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2007-05-02 | 88888 |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-05-02 | |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-03-30 | 76568 |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-03-30 | 76568 |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-03-30 | 76568 |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-02-26 | |
| REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | 2007-02-16 | 73350 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-02-16 | 73350 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-02-16 | 6325 |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-02-12 | 73350 |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-09-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 