Reconsideration Letter

NATIONAL TRAFFIC SYSTEM

American Radio Relay League

Reconsideration Letter

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 76719261

 

MARK: NATIONAL TRAFFIC SYSTEM

 

 

        

*76719261*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       Cary S. Tepper

       Tepper Law Firm, LLC

       Suite 100

       4900 Auburn Avenue

       Bethesda, MD 20814-2632

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/index.jsp  

 

 

 

APPLICANT: American Radio Relay League

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       N/A     

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

      

 

 

 

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is denying the request for the reasons stated below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  The following refusal made final in the Office action dated December 22, 2016 are maintained and continue to be final:  Specimen Unacceptable.  See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). 

 

In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved the outstanding issue, nor does it raise a new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue in the final Office action.  In addition, applicant’s analysis and arguments are not persuasive nor do they shed new light on the issues.  Accordingly, the request is denied.

 

Specifically, applicant provided a letter further explaining the nature of the NATIONAL TRAFFIC SYSTEM program. However, no substitute specimen was provided. The original specimens dated 04/28/2016 and the substitute specimen dated 11/30/2016 remain unacceptable for the reasons explained in the previous Office Actions, namely, for having no connection to the identified services.

 

If applicant has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal.  See TMEP §715.04(a).

 

If no appeal has been filed and time remains in the six-month response period to the final Office action, applicant has the remainder of the response period to (1) comply with and/or overcome any outstanding refusal, and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board.  TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B); see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(3).  The filing of a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal.  37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(B), (c). 

 

 

/Kristin Williams/

Kristin Williams

Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

(571) 270-1942

kristin.williams@uspto.gov

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed