To: | VAREL INTERNATIONAL IND., LLC (vfriedman@dennemeyer-law.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4649385 - SLIPSTREAM - 10167138TR |
Sent: | 05/26/21 12:09:11 PM |
Sent As: | prg@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Owner’s Trademark Registration
U.S. Registration No. 4649385
Mark: SLIPSTREAM
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Owner: VAREL INTERNATIONAL IND., LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 10167138TR
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive the owner’s response to this letter within the time period specified below. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears below.
Issue date: May 26, 2021
The Sections 8 & 15 Combined Affidavit submitted on November 17, 2020, cannot be accepted or acknowledged for the reasons set forth below.
A) OWNER’S ENTITY
Errors in assignment records are corrected by recording a correcting document with the Assignment Recordation Branch. TMEP §§503.06 et seq. For information regarding recording assignments, name changes and mergers, please visit the webpage http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademark/trademark-assignments-change-search-ownership and see TMEP §§503 et seq. For specific questions, please contact the Assignment Recordation Branch at 571-272-3350. To expedite recordation, the owner is encouraged to file requests for recordation through the Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS) at http://etas.uspto.gov. There is a fee for recording ownership documents.
You must notify the undersigned paralegal when the corrected document has been submitted for recordation. The filing of a document with the Assignment Recordation Branch does not extend the time period for responding to this Office action.
If the Combined Affidavit was filed by an entity other than the owner of record, then the filer of the Combined Affidavit must establish its ownership. 37 C.F.R. §3.73(b); TMEP §§1604.07(a)-(b), 1605.04.
B) VERIFIED SUBSTITUTE SPECIMEN
The owner of the registration provided a specimen with its Section 8 Affidavit; however, although the specimen is identified as a catalog or web page, it is unacceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods because it fails to include the necessary ordering information or a weblink for ordering the goods and thus, appears to be mere advertising material. See In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1288-89, 93 USPQ2d 1118, 1123-24 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Genitope Corp., 78 USPQ2d 1819, 1822 (TTAB 2006); In re Dell Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725, 1727-29 (TTAB 2004); TMEP §904.03(h), (i); cf. Lands’ End, Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 513-14, 24 USPQ2d 1314, 1316 (E.D. Va. 1992).
Material that functions merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is not acceptable to show trademark use. TMEP §904.04(b). Leaflets, handbills, brochures, advertising circulars and other advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods. See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §§904.04(b), (c), 1301.04.
A printed or web catalog, web page or similar specimen is acceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods only if it includes the following: (1) a picture of the relevant goods or a textual description that identifies the actual features or inherent characteristics of the goods such that the goods are recognizable, (2) the mark appearing sufficiently near the picture or textual description of the goods so as to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) information necessary to order the goods (e.g., an order form or a phone number, mailing address, or e-mail address for placing orders) or a visible weblink to order the goods. See In re Sones, 590 F.3d at 1288-89, 93 USPQ2d at 1123-24; In re Genitope, 78 USPQ2d at 1822; In re Dell, 71 USPQ2d at 1727-29; Lands’ End, 797 F. Supp. at 513-14, 24 USPQ2d at 1316; TMEP §904.03(h). Without this necessary information, the specimen is mere advertising and is not acceptable to show use in commerce for goods. See, e.g., In re Osterberg, 83 USPQ2d 1220, 1222-24 (TTAB 2007); In re Genitope, 78 USPQ2d at 1822.
The owner may respond by submitting:
(1) A substitute specimen showing current use of the registered mark in commerce for each class of goods specified in the registration; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce during the relevant period for filing the 6-year Section 8.” 37 C.F.R. §2.161(a)(7); TMEP §1604.12(c).
The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted specimen, during the relevant period for filing the 6-year Section 8.
The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statement may jeopardize the validity of this document, declares that s/he is properly authorized to execute this document on behalf of the owner, and all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
__________________________
Signature of Authorized Person
__________________________
Type or Print Name
__________________________
Date
The following persons are properly authorized to sign a Section 8 Affidavit on behalf of the owner:
(1) A person with legal authority to bind the owner (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner);
(2) A person with firsthand knowledge of the facts and actual or implied authority to act on behalf of the owner; or
(3) An authorized attorney who has an actual written or verbal power of attorney or an implied power of attorney from the owner.
37 C.F.R. §§2.161(a)(2), 2.193(e)(1); TMEP §1604.08(a).
DEFICIENCY SURCHARGE REQUIRED: The owner must submit a $100 deficiency surcharge with its response to this Office action. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.164(a)(1); TMEP §1604.17(a).
How to respond. Click to file a Response to Post-Registration Office action.
Direct questions about this Office action to the Post Registration staff member below.
/Dana L. Newton/
Trademark Specialist
Post Registration Division
571-272-9544
USPTO
RESPONSE GUIDANCE