To: | Heraeus Materials Technology GmbH & Co. ETC. (NDKRAMER@MINDSPRING.COM) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76715489 - PD FLASH - Heraeus 1214 |
Sent: | 2/26/2014 2:50:54 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM110@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 76715489
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Heraeus Materials Technology GmbH & Co. ETC.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 2/26/2014
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search Results
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Although no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration, applicant must satisfy/address the following Signed Declaration Requirement:
Requirements to be Addressed
1. Color Drawing Does Not Match Claim of No Color
2. Color Differs on Drawing and Foreign Certificate
3. Signed Declaration Required
Color Drawing Does Not Match Claim of No Color
Applicant has submitted a color drawing but has not claimed color as a feature of the mark. Applications for marks depicted in color must include (1) a complete list of all the colors claimed as a feature of the mark and (2) a mark description of the literal and design elements that specifies where all the colors appear in those elements. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); see TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii).
An applicant may only amend a mark to delete color if the change would not materially alter the mark. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14.
Therefore, applicant must either submit (1) a black and white substitute drawing, or (2) submit color claim and a mark description of all the colors in the mark. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); see TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii). Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise. TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(ii). If black, white, and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must exclude them from the color claim and include in the mark description a statement that the colors black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. See TMEP §807.07(d).
The following color claim and mark description are suggested, if accurate:
Color claim:
“The colors grey, white red and yellow are claimed as a feature of the mark.”
Mark description:
“The mark consists of the literal element “PDFLASH” with “PD” appearing in grey and “FLASH” appearing in yellow with back-shadowing of the letters. Above the word “FLASH” appear two identical parallel lines which begin on the left with a smaller grey and white section which then becomes all red from the left to the end at the right.
See TMEP §807.07(b).
Color Differs on Drawing and Foreign Certificate
The drawing of the mark in the U.S. application is not acceptable because it does not correspond with the mark shown in the foreign registration; specifically, the colors in the two marks do not agree. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.51(c); TMEP §§807.07(d)(ii), 1011.01. The drawing in the U.S. application displays the mark in the colors grey, white, red and yellow; however, the foreign registration shows the mark in the colors black and white.
The drawing of the mark in a U.S. application must be a substantially exact representation of the mark that appears in the foreign registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.51(c); In re Hacot-Colombier, 105 F.3d 616, 618-19, 41 USPQ2d 1523, 1525 (Fed. Cir. 1997); TMEP §§807.12(b), 1011.01; see United Rum Merchs. Ltd. v. Distillers Corp. (S.A.), 9 USPQ2d 1481, 1483-84 (TTAB 1988). However, a mark in a U.S. application may only be amended if the change would not materially alter the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.72(c); In re Wine Soc’y of Am. Inc., 12 USPQ2d 1139, 1141 (TTAB 1989); see TMEP §§807.14 et seq., 1011.03. In the present case, amending the mark in the U.S. application to agree with the foreign registration would not be considered a material alteration.
Therefore, applicant must satisfy the following:
(1) Submit a new color drawing that agrees with the colors shown in the foreign registration.
(2) Ensure that the color claim and mark description in the U.S. application agree with the colors shown in the foreign registration. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.51(c), 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(d)(ii), 1011.01. The mark description must also accurately and concisely describe the literal and design elements of the mark and specify where all the colors appear in those elements. See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(a), 1011.01. Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise. TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(ii). If black, white, and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must exclude them from the color claim and include in the mark description a statement that the colors black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. See TMEP §807.07(d), (d)(ii). The following color claim andmark description are suggested, if accurate:
Color claim:
“The colors grey, white red and yellow are claimed as a feature of the mark.”
Mark description:
“The mark consists of the literal element “PDFLASH” with “PD” appearing in grey and “FLASH” appearing in yellow with back-shadowing of the letters. Above the word “FLASH” appear two identical parallel lines which begin on the left with a smaller grey and white section which then becomes all red from the left to the end at the right.
Alternatively, applicant may amend the application basis from Trademark Act Section 44 to Section 1(a) or 1(b), if applicant can satisfy the requirements for the chosen basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); TMEP §§806.03, 807.12(b). A foreign registration certificate is not required for a Section 1(a) or 1(b) basis. See 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)-(b); TMEP §806.01(a)-(b).
Signed Declaration Required
The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), §1126(d) or §1126(e), he/she believes the applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
_____________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
_____________________________
(Date)
/Thomas M. Manor/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 110
Phone : (571) 270-1519
Fax. No. (571) 273-9110
Thomas.Manor@USPTO.GOV
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.