To: | Nomura International Plc (sdouglass@frosszelnick.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76701600 - TRADESPEX - NOMU 1001519 |
Sent: | 5/24/2010 2:02:43 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM116@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76701600
MARK: TRADESPEX
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Nomura International Plc
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 5/24/2010
Search Results
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Preliminary Amendment is Noted
The examining attorney notes the preliminary amendment filed March 23, 2010. The signed declaration has been accepted and entered into the record.
Information Regarding the Mark’s Significance Required
Amended Identification of Goods and Services Required
Class 009
The wording “computer software for use in relation to financial and investment matters” in the identification of goods must be clarified because it is unacceptably indefinite. TMEP §1402.01. Applicant must describe the particular function of its software (e.g., for conducting electronic securities trading transactions, etc.). Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “computer software for [specify particular function ] for use in relation to financial and investment matters.”
Class 036
Note that activities that are performed by applicant’s computer software (rather than by individuals) are not distinct services but are simply functions or features of the computer software.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “financial analysis services featuring financial information derived from a single security analytics system for equities and other securities; financial database services relating to investments, stocks and shares, namely, providing computer databases featuring financial information about investments, stocks, and shares]” in International Class 036.
To summarize, applicant may adopt the following identification of goods and services, if accurate:
Class 009 Computer software for [specify particular function ] for use in relation to financial and investment matters; computer software for the electronic administration and management of investment portfolios; computer software for analysis of financial information and data
Class 036 Financial and investment portfolio management services; financial analysis services; financial analysis services featuring financial information derived from a single security analytics system for equities and other securities; financial services being analysis of pre and post trading financial data and information; financial services being hedging and optimal portfolio construction; administration of investments, funds, shares and financial affairs; provision of financial and investment information and data, including by access to a computer database; financial database services relating to investments, stocks and shares, namely, providing computer databases featuring financial information about investments, stocks, and shares]; computerized financial analysis services
If the suggestions offered by the examining attorney are incomplete or are inaccurate, applicant is encouraged to consult the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services for guidance at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.
Information Regarding Multi-Class Applications
The application identifies goods and services that may be classified in more than the number of international classes covered by the fee paid. Therefore, the applicant must either: (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fee already paid, or (2) pay the required fee for each additional class. 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.0l, 1401.04, 1401.04(b) and 1403.01.
If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the following for those goods and services based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b) and a foreign registration under Trademark Act Section 44(e):
(1) Applicant must list the goods and services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order. TMEP § 1403.01; and
(2) Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and services not covered by the fee already paid (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov). 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810 and 1403.01.
Clarification Regarding Section 44 Filing Basis Required
Although Section 44(d) provides a basis for filing and a priority filing date, it does not provide a basis for publication or registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(4)(iii); TMEP §§1002.02, 1003.03. It is unclear whether applicant intends to rely on Section 44(e) as an additional basis for registration.
Therefore, applicant must clarify the basis in the application by satisfying one of the following:
(1) If applicant intends to rely on Section 44(e), in addition to Section 1(b), as a basis for registration, applicant must so specify. In addition, (i) applicant’s country of origin must either be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law; and (ii) applicant must submit a true copy, photocopy, certification or certified copy of the foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(b)-(c), (e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§806.02(f), 1002.01, 1004. A copy of the foreign registration must be a copy of a document that issued to the applicant by or was certified by the intellectual property office in the applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1004.01. If the foreign registration is not written in English, then applicant must provide an English translation. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii). The translation should be signed by the translator. TMEP §1004.01(b). If the foreign registration has not yet issued, or applicant requires additional time to procure a copy of the foreign registration (and English translation, as appropriate), applicant should respond to this Office action requesting suspension pending receipt of the foreign registration documentation. TMEP §1003.04(b).; or
(2) If applicant intends to rely on an intent to use basis under Section 1(b), while retaining its Section 44(d) priority filing date, applicant must specify that it does not intend to rely on Section 44(e) as a basis for registration and request that the mark be approved for publication based solely on the Section 1(b) basis. See TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.04(b), 1003.04(b). Although the mark may be approved for publication on the Section 1(b) basis, it will not register until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed. See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c)-(d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103.
Miscellaneous Information Regarding Responding to this Office Action
Please note that there is no required format or form for responding to this Office action. However, applicant should include the following information on all correspondence with the Office: (1) the name and law office number of the examining attorney; (2) the serial number of this application; (3) the mailing date of this Office action; and, (4) applicant's telephone number.
When responding to this Office action, applicant must make sure to respond in writing to each refusal and requirement raised. If there is a refusal to register the proposed mark, then applicant may wish to argue against the refusal, i.e., explain why it should be withdrawn and why the mark should register. If there are other requirements, then applicant should simply set forth in writing the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them into the application record. Applicant must also sign and date its response.
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/Debra Lee/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 116
Voice: 571-272-5897
Fax: 571-273-9116
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.