Offc Action Outgoing

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.

On March 12, 2010, the Office issued an action requiring applicant to submit an amended identification of goods and substitute specimens for classes 3, 5, and 31. Applicant’s amended identification of goods is acceptable; however applicant specimens do not match. Therefore, the following requirement is now made FINAL: acceptable specimens in class 3, 5, and 31. See37 C.F.R. §2.64(a).

THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES ONLY TO CLASSES 3, 5, AND 31 ONLY

Mark Differs on Drawing and Specimen

The mark on the specimen disagrees with the mark on the drawing. In this case, the specimens display the mark as ĒCO-FRESH or ECOFRESH; and the drawing shows the mark as ECO-FRESH. In the first instance applicant replaces one character for another (Ē for E), and in the second instance applicant deletes an entire character (-). Applicant argues that despite this replacement and deletion that the application should move forward because the marks are in “block letter” or contain a standard character claim, and, therefore, the Office may not dictate applicant’s choice of stylization. Applicant is correct that the Office does not dictate the degree of stylization that applicant may use; however, this refusal is not related to stylization, but to replacement and deletion of entire characters. Applicant’s use on the specimen must be substantially exact, and at least contain the all the same characters as the drawing. TMEP §807.03(e).

An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). The mark on the drawing must be a substantially exact representation of the mark on the specimen. 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a); TMEP §807.12(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(1). In addition, the drawing of the mark can be amended only if the amendment does not materially alter the mark as originally filed. 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2); TMEP §§807.12(a), 807.14 et seq.

Therefore, applicant must submit one of the following:

(1) A new drawing of the mark that agrees with the mark on the specimen but does not materially alter the original mark. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2); TMEP §§807.12(a), 807.14 et seq. Amending the drawing to agree with the specimen would not be considered a material alteration of the mark in this case.; or

(2) A substitute specimen showing use in commerce of the mark on the drawing, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.” See 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §§807.12(a), 904.05. If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.

If applicant cannot satisfy one of the above requirements, applicant may amend the application from a use in commerce basis under Trademark Act Section 1(a) to an intent to use basis under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. See TMEP §806.03(c). However, if applicant amends the basis to Section 1(b), registration will not be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen. See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c)-(d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103.

To amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33: “Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the filing date of the application.” 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b); see 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1).

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark and/or service mark. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).

Sample Declaration

The following is a properly worded “declaration” under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. This declaration must be personally signed and dated by a person authorized under 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1). TMEP §804.01(b).

The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

_____________________________

(Signature)

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

_____________________________

(Date)

Proper Response to Final Office Action

If applicant does not respond within six months of the mailing date of this final Office action, the following classes to which the final requirement applies will be deleted from the application by Examiner’s Amendment: 3, 5, and 31. The application will then proceed for the remaining class. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

Applicant may respond to this final Office action by:

(1) Submitting a response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements, if feasible; and/or

(2) Filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with an appeal fee of $100 per class.

37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(18), 2.64(a); TBMP ch. 1200; TMEP §714.04.

In certain rare circumstances, a petition to the Director may be filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review a final Office action that is limited to procedural issues. 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b), TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters). The petition fee is $100. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).

Contacting the Examining Attorney

If applicant has any questions concerning the above action, it is encouraged to contact the examining attorney at the number listed below.

/DETJr/

David E. Tooley, Jr.

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 112

phone: (571) 272-8206

fax: (571) 273-8206

david.tooley@u

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen. If TARR shows no change for more than six months, call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.