Response to Office Action

AMERICAN BASICS

IMAGINE APPAREL GROUP, L.L.C.

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2011)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 76697311
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 115
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

 

            Attached is a Section 2(f) Declaration attesting that Applicant's mark has acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning as a source indicator to the purchasing public based on extensive advertising, extensive sales and consumer recognition and goodwill built up in the mark. The Declaration attests that Applicant has attained sales exceeding $50 million with this mark over the last ten years alone (Applicant was also selling merchandise from 1992-1999, but sales records are not immediately accessible).  Consumers associate the products sold under the mark with Applicant, so that the primary significance of the mark is to indicate source. Therefore, the mark has acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning.


            First, Applicant notes that any reasonable doubt as to whether a mark has acquired distinctiveness must be resolved in favor of the applicant. See In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc., 4 USPQ 2d 1141, 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1987); In re Women's Publishing Co. Inc., 23 USPQ 2d 1876 (TTAB 1992).

            As a result of 17 years of continuous use by Applicant and its predecessor, and over $50 million in sales, the mark is not understood to constitute a "merely descriptive" phrase used in connection with simply describing the products.

An intent-to-use applicant who has used the mark on related goods and/or services may file a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f) before filing an allegation of use if applicant can establish that, as a result of applicant's use of the mark on other goods and/or services, the mark has become distinctive of the goods in the intent-to-use application, and that this previously created distinctiveness will transfer to the goods in the intent-to-use application when use in commerce begins.  In re Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp., 240 F.3d 1341, 1347, 57 USPQ2d 1807, 1812 (Fed. Cir. 2001); TMEP §1212.09(a).   To that end, Applicant is also the owner of Ser. No. 76696521 for the identical mark for "clothing, namely, tops, shirts, t-shirts, athletic wear, active wear, sleepwear, lounge wear, underwear, thermal underwear, bras, hosiery, and socks," which is a currently pending 1(a) application, based on use in commerce with a claimed date of first use of 1992.

            It is therefore respectfully requested that the 2(e)(2) refusal be withdrawn.

ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
SECTION 2(f) BASED ON EVIDENCE The mark has become distinctive of the goods/services, as demonstrated by the attached evidence.
        2(f) EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE e2f-64524534-131451005_._20091216133501.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (2 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT8\IMAGEOUT8\766\973\76697311\xml1\ROA0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT8\IMAGEOUT8\766\973\76697311\xml1\ROA0003.JPG
SECTION 2(f) The mark has become distinctive of the goods/services through the applicant's substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement.
MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT The Examining Attorney requests that Applicant amend its goods and services identification to classify sunglasses in Class 9, and backpacks in Class 18. Applicant respectfully requests that it be allowed to resolve the refusal to register based on Section 2(e)(2) before it is required to amend its goods description.
SIGNATURE SECTION
DECLARATION SIGNATURE /brian gaynor/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Brian M. Gaynor
SIGNATORY'S POSITION attorney
DATE SIGNED 12/16/2009
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /brian gaynor/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Brian M. Gaynor
SIGNATORY'S POSITION attorney
DATE SIGNED 12/16/2009
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Wed Dec 16 13:24:11 EST 2009
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XX.XX-200
91216132411275879-7669731
1-460eb7dd521a0a265598681
9a2c5e61072-N/A-N/A-20091
216131451005343



PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2011)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 76697311 has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

 

            Attached is a Section 2(f) Declaration attesting that Applicant's mark has acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning as a source indicator to the purchasing public based on extensive advertising, extensive sales and consumer recognition and goodwill built up in the mark. The Declaration attests that Applicant has attained sales exceeding $50 million with this mark over the last ten years alone (Applicant was also selling merchandise from 1992-1999, but sales records are not immediately accessible).  Consumers associate the products sold under the mark with Applicant, so that the primary significance of the mark is to indicate source. Therefore, the mark has acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning.


            First, Applicant notes that any reasonable doubt as to whether a mark has acquired distinctiveness must be resolved in favor of the applicant. See In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc., 4 USPQ 2d 1141, 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1987); In re Women's Publishing Co. Inc., 23 USPQ 2d 1876 (TTAB 1992).

            As a result of 17 years of continuous use by Applicant and its predecessor, and over $50 million in sales, the mark is not understood to constitute a "merely descriptive" phrase used in connection with simply describing the products.

An intent-to-use applicant who has used the mark on related goods and/or services may file a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f) before filing an allegation of use if applicant can establish that, as a result of applicant's use of the mark on other goods and/or services, the mark has become distinctive of the goods in the intent-to-use application, and that this previously created distinctiveness will transfer to the goods in the intent-to-use application when use in commerce begins.  In re Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp., 240 F.3d 1341, 1347, 57 USPQ2d 1807, 1812 (Fed. Cir. 2001); TMEP §1212.09(a).   To that end, Applicant is also the owner of Ser. No. 76696521 for the identical mark for "clothing, namely, tops, shirts, t-shirts, athletic wear, active wear, sleepwear, lounge wear, underwear, thermal underwear, bras, hosiery, and socks," which is a currently pending 1(a) application, based on use in commerce with a claimed date of first use of 1992.

            It is therefore respectfully requested that the 2(e)(2) refusal be withdrawn.



ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Section 2(f), based on Evidence
The mark has become distinctive of the goods/services, as demonstrated by the attached evidence.
Original PDF file:
e2f-64524534-131451005_._20091216133501.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (2 pages)
2(f) evidence-1
2(f) evidence-2

Section 2(f), based on Use
The mark has become distinctive of the goods/services through the applicant's substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement.

The Examining Attorney requests that Applicant amend its goods and services identification to classify sunglasses in Class 9, and backpacks in Class 18. Applicant respectfully requests that it be allowed to resolve the refusal to register based on Section 2(e)(2) before it is required to amend its goods description.

SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature
If the applicant is seeking registration under Section 1(b) and/or Section 44 of the Trademark Act, the applicant has had a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services as of the filing date of the application. 37 C.F.R. Secs. 2.34(a)(2)(i); 2.34 (a)(3)(i); and 2.34(a)(4)(ii); and/or the applicant has had a bona fide intention to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by its members. 37 C.F. R. Sec. 2.44. If the applicant is seeking registration under Section 1(a) of the Trademark Act, the mark was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application as of the application filing date or as of the date of any submitted allegation of use. 37 C.F.R. Secs. 2.34(a)(1)(i); and/or the applicant has exercised legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by its members. 37 C.F.R. Sec. 244. The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. Section1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. Section1051(b), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; that if the original application was submitted unsigned, that all statements in the original application and this submission made of the declaration signer's knowledge are true; and all statements in the original application and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.

Signature: /brian gaynor/      Date: 12/16/2009
Signatory's Name: Brian M. Gaynor
Signatory's Position: attorney

Response Signature
Signature: /brian gaynor/     Date: 12/16/2009
Signatory's Name: Brian M. Gaynor
Signatory's Position: attorney

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 76697311
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Dec 16 13:24:11 EST 2009
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XX.XX-200912161324112758
79-76697311-460eb7dd521a0a2655986819a2c5
e61072-N/A-N/A-20091216131451005343


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed