Offc Action Outgoing

TAI CHI

Diamond Hong, Inc.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           76/691951

 

    MARK: TAI CHI   

 

 

        

*76691951*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          KENNETH CANG LI   

          Law Offices of Kenneth Cang Li

          65 BROADWAY STE 802

          NEW YORK, NY 10006-2503    

           

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:           Diamond Hong, Inc.   

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          DH-086-08        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

          

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The Office records have been searched and there are no similar registered or pending marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.

 

ENGLISH TRANSLATION REQUIRED

 

Applicant must submit (1) a statement translating the non-English wording in the mark, and (2) a statement transliterating any non-Latin characters in the mark, with either a translation of the corresponding non-English wording or a statement that the transliterated term has no meaning in a foreign language.  TMEP §809; see 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a), 2.61(b).  A transliteration is the phonetic spelling, in Latin characters, of the terms in the mark that are in non-Latin characters.

 

The following formats are acceptable for a translation and transliteration statement:

 

The non-Latin characters in the mark transliterate to “_________________________,” and this means “______________________” in English.

 

The non-Latin characters in the mark transliterate to “______________________,” and this has no meaning in a foreign language.

 

TMEP §809.02.

 

DESCRIPTION OF MARK REQUIRED

 

The applied-for mark is not in standard characters and applicant did not provide a description of the mark with the initial application.  Applications for marks not in standard characters must include an accurate and concise description of the entire mark that identifies literal elements as well as any design elements.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808 et seq.   

 

Therefore, applicant must provide a description of the applied-for mark.  The following is suggested:

 

The mark consists of a man engaged in a tai chi position atop a yin-yang symbol with the term “TAI CHI” below the symbol and a Chinese character on each side of the symbol .

 

DISCLAIMER REQUIRED

 

The applicant must insert a disclaimer of “TAI CHI” in the application because the term(s) is/are merely descriptive of the goods and/or services.  Trademark Act Section 6, 15 U.S.C. Section 1056; TMEP sections 1213 and 1213.08(a)(i).  Please see attached dictionary definition.

 

Trademark Act Section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. Section 1056(a), states that the Commissioner may require the applicant to disclaim an unregistrable component of a mark.  Trademark Act Section 2(e), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e), bars the registration of a mark which is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive of the goods. Therefore, the Commissioner may require the disclaimer of a portion of a mark which, when used in connection with the goods or services, is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive.  If an applicant does not comply with a disclaimer requirement, the examining attorney may refuse registration of the entire mark.  TMEP section 1213.01(b).

 

A disclaimer does not remove the disclaimed matter from the mark.  It is simply a statement that the applicant does not claim exclusive rights in the disclaimed wording or design apart from the mark as shown in the drawing.

 

The following cases explain the disclaimer requirement more fully:  In re Kraft, Inc., 218 USPQ 571 (TTAB 1983); In re EBS Data Processing, Inc., 212 USPQ 964 (TTAB 1981); In re National Presto Industries, Inc., 197 USPQ 188 (TTAB 1977); In re Pendleton Tool Industries, Inc., 157 USPQ 114 (TTAB 1968).

 

The computerized printing format for the Trademark Official Gazette requires a standard form for a disclaimer.   TMEP section 1213.08(a)(i).  A properly worded disclaimer should read as follows:

 

            No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “TAI CHI” apart from the mark as shown.

 

See In re Owatonna Tool Co., 231 USPQ 493 (Comm'r Pats. 1983).

 

CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS/SERVICES

 

The goods, “processed fruits” are classified incorrectly.  Applicant must amend the application to classify the goods in International Class 29.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7), 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a), 1401.03(b).

 

Proper classification of goods and services is a purely administrative matter within the sole discretion of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  In re Tee-Pak, Inc., 164 USPQ 88, 89 (TTAB 1969).

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

The wording “herbal extracts” and “ginseng,” in International Class 5, “vegetables and marine products and seafood,” in International Class 29, and “malt beverage,” in International Class 32, in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite, as indicated below.  The applicant must amend the identification to specify the commercial name of the goods and/or the industry or field in which the goods are used, as indicated below in the suggested identification.  If there is no common commercial name for the product, the applicant must describe the product and its uses. TMEP section 1402.01.  Moreover, the applicant has identified goods that may be classified in separate classes.

 

It is the applicant's duty and prerogative to identify the goods and services.  TMEP Section 1402.02(d).  The identification of goods or services should be clear, accurate and as concise as possible.  See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 175 USPQ 505 (TTAB 1972); In re Cardinal Laboratories, Inc., 149 USPQ 709 (TTAB 1966); California Spray-Chemical Corp. v. Osmose Wood Preserving Co. of America, Inc., 102 USPQ 321 (Comm'r Pats. 1954); Ex parte A.C. Gilbert Co., 99 USPQ 344 (Comm'r Pats. 1953).  Furthermore, the identification of goods and services must be specific and definite.  In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 1 USPQ2d 1296 (TTAB 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 824 F.2d 957, 3 USPQ2d 1450 (Fed. Cir. 1987).  TMEP Section 1402.01.

 

The Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual sets out acceptable language for identifying goods and services of various types.  Utilizing identification language from the Manual may enable trademark owners to avoid problems relating to indefiniteness with respect to the goods or services identified in their applications for registration; however, applicants should note that they must assert actual use in commerce or a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce for the goods or services specified.  TMEP Section 1402.04.

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. Section 2.71(b); TMEP section 1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.

 

The applicant may adopt one or more of the following, if accurate: 

 

“Cosmetics; skin care preparations, namely, body balm; body oils and essential oils,” in International Class 3;

 

“Dietary supplements; medicinal herbal extracts; sticking plasters for medical purposes; herbal topical creams, gels, powder, liniment and ointments for the relief of aches and pain; anti-inflammatory ointments; ginseng for medical use,” in International Class 5;

 

“Edible bird’s nests; canned or bottled fruits; processed ginseng for use as a vegetable; processed vegetables; fish; seafood; and processed fruits,” in International Class 29;

 

“Processed herbs; processed ginseng used as an herb; herbal food beverages; royal jelly for food purposes; and tea,” in International Class 30;

 

“Beer; and malt liquor,” in International Class 32; and/or

 

“Wine; distilled spirits; and liqueurs,” in International Class 33.

 

SPECIMEN REQUIRED FOR INTERNATIONAL CLASS 5 AND 29

 

The specimen is not acceptable for the goods in International Classes 5 and 29 because they do not show the applied-for mark used in connection with any of the goods specified in the application for those classes.  An application must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services based on Section 1(a) in the application.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04. 

 

In this case, the specimens show use of the proposed mark on tea, which only satisfies use for the goods identified in International Class 30. 

 

Therefore, applicant must submit the following:

 

(1)   A substitute specimen showing use of the mark for each class of goods and/or services specified in the application; and

 

(2)   The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: The specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.”  37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05.  If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c).

 

Examples of specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging, or displays associated with the goods at their point of sale.  TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Examples of specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services.  TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.

 

If applicant cannot satisfy the above requirements, applicant may amend the Section 1(a) filing basis (use in commerce) to Section 1(b) (intent to use basis), for which no specimen is required.  However, should applicant amend the basis to Section 1(b), registration cannot be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen.  15 U.S.C. §1051(c); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP Chapter 1100. 

 

In order to amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the filing date of the application.”  15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(2), 2.35(b)(1); TMEP §806.03(c).

 

Pending a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark or service mark for the identified goods or services.  15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 

/Alec Powers/

Trademark Examining Attorney

US Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 101

Phone: 571-272-9309

Fax: 571-273-9101

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed