Offc Action Outgoing

INTEGRATIVE RESTORATION

Miller, Richard C.

TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 3464978 - INTEGRATIVE RESTORATION - T-36452-A

To: Miller, Richard C. (cbanti@andersonzeigler.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 3464978 - INTEGRATIVE RESTORATION - T-36452-A
Sent: 09/12/18 09:37:05 AM
Sent As: PRG@uspto.gov
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT OWNER’S TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

 

    U.S. REGISTRATION NO. 3464978

 

    OWNER:     Miller, Richard C.

 

 

        

76681199

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S ADDRESS:

CATHERINE J. BANTI

ANDERSON, ZEIGLER, DISHAROON

PO BOX 1498

SANTA ROSA, CA 95402-1498

 

 

 

    MARK:        INTEGRATIVE RESTORATION

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO.   T-36452-A          

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 cbanti@andersonzeigler.com

 

 

 

CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER AND SELECT FORM NUMBER 11:

 

 http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/reg_maintain.jsp

 

 

POST REGISTRATION OFFICE ACTION

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/12/2018

U.S. Registration Number:  3464978

 

The Combined Section 8 Affidavit & Section 9 Renewal Application was received on July 11, 2018.  The Section 9 portion of the combined filing can be granted.  However, the Section 8 portion is not accepted for the reason(s) set forth below.

 

I.                 Specimen Deficiencies For Both International class 009 and 041

 

(A)   The specimen submitted for International Class 009 with the Section 8 Affidavit is unacceptable because it does not show trademark use. 

 

Specifically, the specimen consists of a mailing box with a name and address and design and is unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use because the mark, as it appears on the specimen, is used only as a trade name to identify the owner’s business.  Although a designation may function as both a trade name and a trademark, a specimen is unacceptable if it shows use of a mark solely as a trade name.  See In re Supply Guys, Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1488, 1491 (TTAB 2008); In re Diamond Hill Farms, 32 USPQ2d 1383, 1384 (TTAB 1994); TMEP §1202.01. 

 

 

(B)   The specimen submitted for International class 041 with the Section 8 Affidavit shows a materially different mark from that in the registration.  Specifically, the specimen shows the mark as Integrative Restoration Institute Anahata Press and the registration shows the mark as Integrative Restoration.

 

The specimen cannot be accepted because the character of the registered mark appears materially altered on the submitted specimen, and it appears that the registered mark is no longer in use.  In re International Nickel Co., Inc., 282 F.2d 952, 127 USPQ 331 (C.C.P.A. 1960); In re Continental Distilling Corp., 254 F.2d 139, 117 USPQ 300 (C.C.P.A. 1958); Ex parte Richards, 153 USPQ 853 (Comm’r Pats. 1967); see TMEP §§807.14 et seq., 1604.13, 1609.02(a).

 

 

(C)   The specimen submitted for International Class 041 with the Section 8 Affidavit is unacceptable because it does not reference the services specified in the registration. 

 

A specimen for a service mark must show use of the mark “in the sale or advertising of services.”  See Trademark Act Section 45, 15 U.S.C. §1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(2).  Specimens for service marks must show an association between the mark and the services identified in the registration.  In re Adair, 45 USPQ2d 1211, 1215 (TTAB 1997).  If the specimen does not show the mark with reference to, or association with, the services, the specimen fails to show service mark usage.  See In re DSM Pharms., Inc., 87 USPQ2d 1623, 1625-26 (TTAB 2008).

 

Therefore, the owner must submit the following:

 

(1) A substitute specimen showing current use of the registered mark in commerce for each class of services specified in the registration; and

 

(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: The substitute specimen was in use in commerce during the relevant period for filing the 10-year Section 8.”  37 C.F.R. §2.161(g); TMEP §1604.12(c).

 

Examples of specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Examples of specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the actual sale or advertising of the services.  See TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.

 

II.               Sample Declaration

 

The following statement and declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 can be used to verify the Section 8 Affidavit, if properly signed and dated:

 

The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted specimen, during the relevant period for filing the 10-year Section 8.

 

The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statement may jeopardize the validity of this document, declares that s/he is properly authorized to execute this document on behalf of the owner, and all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

__________________________

Signature of Authorized Person

__________________________

Type or Print Name

__________________________

Date

 

III.              Authorized Signatories

 

The following persons are properly authorized to sign a Section 8 Affidavit on behalf of the owner:

(1)   A person with legal authority to bind the owner (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner);

(2)   A person with firsthand knowledge of the facts and actual or implied authority to act on behalf of the owner; or

(3)   An authorized attorney who has an actual written or verbal power of attorney or an implied power of attorney from the owner.

37 C.F.R. §§2.161(b), 2.193(e)(1); TMEP §1604.08(a).

 

IV.             Response Period

 

RESPONSE TIME DEADLINE:  A complete response must be received within 6 months from the issuance date of this Office action.  The owner must respond to all inquiries set forth in this Office action to avoid cancellation of the registration.  If a response is not received, the registration will be cancelled in its entirety.  37 C.F.R. §2.163(b)-(c); TMEP §1604.16.

 

DEFICIENCY SURCHARGE REQUIRED:  The owner must submit a $100 deficiency surcharge with its response to this Office action if the response is submitted online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (“TEAS”).  A $200 deficiency surcharge must be submitted if the response is submitted on paper.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.164(a)(1); TMEP §1604.17(a).

 

 

 

 

/Ajay R. David/

Ajay R. David

Trademark Specialist

Post Registration Division

Phone: 571-272-1565

Fax No: 571-273-1565

Email: ajay.david@uspto.gov

 

 

 

 

Mandatory Electronic Filing Rules Advisory

The USPTO proposes to change federal trademark rules to require applicants and registrants to (1) file submissions concerning applications and registrations online using the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and (2) provide and maintain an accurate email address for receiving correspondence from the USPTO. See the Mandatory Electronic Filing Rules webpage for more information.

 

 

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Post-Registration Office action form number 11 at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/reg_maintain.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the registration.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned specialist.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this registration will be placed in the official registration record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual owner or someone with legal authority to bind an owner (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint owners). If an owner is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.

 

CHECK THE STATUS OF THE REGISTRATION:  To check the status of your registration at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

 

 

TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 3464978 - INTEGRATIVE RESTORATION - T-36452-A

To: Miller, Richard C. (cbanti@andersonzeigler.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 3464978 - INTEGRATIVE RESTORATION - T-36452-A
Sent: 09/12/18 09:37:05 AM
Sent As: PRG@uspto.gov
Attachments:





IMPORTANT NOTICE
USPTO OFFICE ACTION HAS ISSUED ON 09/12/2018 FOR
REGISTRATION NO. 3464978


Please follow the instructions below to continue the examination of your post registration filing:

VIEW OFFICE ACTION: Click on this link

http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/view.action?DDA=Y&sn=76681199&type=OOA&date=20180912

(or copy and paste this URL into the address field of your browser), or visit http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/ and enter the registration number to access the Office action.

PLEASE NOTE: The Office action may not be immediately available but will be viewable within 24 hours of this notification.

RESPONSE MAY BE REQUIRED: You should carefully review the Office action to determine (1) if a response is required, (2) how to respond and (3) the applicable response time period your response deadline will be calculated from.

Do NOT hit 'Reply' to this e-mail notification, or otherwise attempt to e-mail your response, as the USPTO does NOT accept e-mailed responses. Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System response form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm.

HELP: For technical assistance in accessing the Office action, please e-mail tsdr@uspto.gov. Please contact the assigned examiner with questions about the Office action.

WARNING


1. The USPTO will NOT send a separate e-mail with the Office action attached.

2. Failure to file any required response by the applicable deadline may result in the cancellation and/or expiration of your registration.

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed