UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/669987
APPLICANT: Four Winds Corporation
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
MARK: ALBUM
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 3073D-0092TM
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION: If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.
Serial Number 76/669987
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application filed on December 5, 2006 and has determined the following:
The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
The current wording used to describe the goods is unacceptable as indefinite and needs clarification because it is too broad and could include goods classified in other international classes. TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03.
Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate: TMEP §1402.01.
Class 006: “Metal hat-hanging hooks; Metal clothes hooks; Baskets of common metals; Shoe racks of common metals; Sliding frames of common metals; Metal trouser stick racks”;
Class 020: “Drawer slides; Shoe racks; Rattan-like baskets; Rattan-like basket covers; Sock racks; Non-metal trouser stick racks; Non-metal clips for skirts and garments; Hampers”;
Class 021: “Plastic trays; Jewelry trays of wood; Accessories trays of wood;
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.
Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.
Applicant must clarify the number of classes for which registration is sought. The submitted filing fee is insufficient to cover all the classes in the application. Specifically, the application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least three classes, however, the applicant paid for only one class.
Applicant must either: (1) restrict the application to the number of class(es) covered by the fee already paid, or (2) pay the required fee for each additional class(es). 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.0l, 1401.04, 1401.04(b) and 1403.01.
If the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class, application based on use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a), the applicant must comply with each of the following:
(1) The applicant must specifically identify the goods and services in each class and list the goods and services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order. TMEP §1403.01.
(2) The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods/services not covered by the fee already paid. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1) and 2.86(b); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01. Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:
(a) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or
(b) $375 per international class if filed on paper
These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.
The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.
(3) The applicant must submit:
(a) dates of first use and first use in commerce and one specimen for each class that includes goods or services based on use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a). The dates of use must be at least as early as the filing date of this application, 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1) and 2.86(a), and the specimen(s) must have been in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application, and/or
(b) a statement of a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with all the goods or services specified in each class that includes goods or services based on a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b), where such statement was not included for the goods or services in the original application.
(4) The applicant must submit an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 signed by the applicant to verify (3) above. 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(a) and 2.71(c).
Please note that in the event an additional class is added to this application, a specimen is required for each of the identified classes of goods. A specimen showing use of the mark in commerce for each class of goods is required for an application based on use of the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a). TMEP §904.
Applicant must submit (1) a specimen (i.e., an example of how applicant actually uses its mark in commerce for the goods listed in the application) for each class of goods showing the mark as it is used in commerce, and, (2) a statement that “the specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application,” verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.56(a); TMEP §§904.01 et seq. and 904.09.
Examples of acceptable specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging, or displays associated with the goods at their point of sale. TMEP §§904.04 et seq.
Because of the degree of stylization of the font used to depict the mark on the drawing page, applicant must clarify whether a standard character drawing format or a special-form drawing format was intended. TMEP §§807.03 et seq. and 807.04 et seq. If a standard character drawing was intended, then applicant must submit the following statement: “The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font, style, size, or color.” 37 C.F.R. §2.52(a). If a special-form drawing was intended, then applicant must state so for the record. 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b).
In a standard character drawing, the mark on the drawing consists of only words, letters or numbers, but does not include any designs or claims as to particular font, style, size, or color. A registration for a mark using a standard character drawing affords protection not only for the standard character version of the mark, but for any possible renderings of the mark, as long as those renderings do not contain any design elements; i.e., a registered standard character drawing of the mark gives protection for display on the specimens in any lettering style. A special-form drawing, on the other hand, shows the mark in stylized letters and/or with a design element and provides protection for only that specific rendering. 37 C.F.R. §2.52; TMEP §§807.03 et seq. 807.04 et seq.
Applicant asserts use of the mark in commerce and submits specimens, and applicant asserts that it is filing the application under a 1(b) basis for the same goods and/or services. Applicant must delete one basis or divide the goods and/or services between the two bases, as appropriate. An applicant may not assert both use of the mark in commerce, under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a), and intent to use the mark in commerce, under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b), for the same goods or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(b)(1); TMEP §806.02(b).
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
To expedite prosecution of this application, applicant is encouraged to file its response to this Office action through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.
/Kelly McCoy/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 107
Phone - (571) 272-8976
Fax - (571) 273-8976
HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.