Offc Action Outgoing

THE DIFFERENCE IS REAL

JOHNSON & JOHNSON

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           76/662930

 

    APPLICANT:         JOHNSON & JOHNSON

 

 

        

*76662930*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  RICHARD F. BIRIBAUER

  JOHNSON & JOHNSON

  ONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLAZA

  NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY 08933-7001

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       THE DIFFERENCE IS REAL

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   N/A

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  76/662930

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

The identification of goods for International Class 5 is acceptable and remains unchanged.

 

 

 

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND CLASSIFICATION:

 

The identification of goods is not acceptable because wording is vague and overly broad.  In addition, some of the goods may fall in more than one class.  Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate: 

 

Vision correction lenses, namely, contact lenses; computer software for ______ (the applicant must specify the function of the software, for instance, conducting vision testing and screening for the purpose of vision care and correction, namely, visual acuity, visual field perimetry, contrast sensitivity, and color vision); electronic publications, namely, _____ (the applicant must specify the type of publication, for instance, magazines, books, booklets) in the field of vision care and correction recorded on computer media, in International Class 9.

 

Publications, namely, _____ (the applicant must specify the type of publication, for instance, magazines, books, booklets) in the field of vision care and correction, in International Class 16.

 

TMEP § 1402.01.

 

Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.

 

The decision as to the proper classification of goods or services is a purely administrative matter within the sole discretion of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  In re Tee-Pak inc., 164 USPQ 88 (TTAB 1969).

 

For assistance with identifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES:

 

The identification of services for International Class 35 is acceptable and remains unchanged.

 

The identification of services is not acceptable because wording is vague and overly broad.  Applicant may adopt the following identification of services, if accurate: 

 

Educational services, namely, ______ (the applicant must specify the mode of instruction, for instance, seminars, workshops, classes) in the field of vision care and correction, in International Class 41.

 

Professional services, namely, providing _____ (the applicant must specify the nature of the services, medical services) in the field of vision care and correction, in International Class 44.

 

TMEP §1402.01.

 

Please note that, while the identification of services may be amended to clarify or limit the services, adding to the services or broadening the scope of the services is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include services that are not within the scope of the services set forth in the present identification.

 

For assistance with identifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

INSUFFICIENT FEES:

 

Applicant must clarify the number of classes for which registration is sought.  The submitted filing fees are insufficient to cover all the classes in the application.  Specifically, the application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least 6 international classes, however applicant paid the fee for only 4 class(es).

 

Applicant must either: (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fee already paid, or (2) pay the required fee for each additional class.  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.0l, 1401.04, 1401.04(b) and 1403.01.

 

The filing fee for adding classes to an application is as follows:

 

(1)     $325 per class, when the fees are submitted with a response filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html; and

 

(2)     $375 per class, when the fees are submitted with a paper response. 

 

37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(i) and (ii); TMEP §810.

 

RESPONSE:

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

/Marlene D. Bell/

Marlene D. Bell

Law Office 105

Trademark Examiner

(571) 272-9291

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.  NOTE:  Do not respond by e-mail.  THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining attorney’s name.  NOTE:  The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the Office, not the postmarked date.  To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.  37 C.F.R. §2.197.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed