Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  76/648883

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

Unclear if Standard Character Drawing Intended

 

Because the applicant submitted an old application which references typed drawings, applicant must clarify whether a standard character drawing format or a special-form drawing format was intended which are the new types of drawings.  TMEP §§807.03 et seq. and 807.04 et seq.  If a standard character drawing was intended, then applicant must submit the following statement:  “The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font, style, size, or color.”  37 C.F.R. §2.52(a).  If a special-form drawing was intended, then applicant must state so for the record.  37 C.F.R. §2.52(b).

 

In a standard character drawing, the mark on the drawing consists of only words, letters or numbers, but does not include any designs or claims as to particular font, style, size, or color.  A registration for a mark using a standard character drawing affords protection not only for the standard character version of the mark, but for any possible renderings of the mark, as long as those renderings do not contain any design elements; i.e., a registered standard character drawing of the mark gives protection for display on the specimens in any lettering style.  A special-form drawing, on the other hand, shows the mark in stylized letters and/or with a design element and provides protection for only that specific rendering.  37 C.F.R. §2.52; TMEP §§807.03 et seq. 807.04 et seq.

 

Identification of Goods

 

The wording in the identification of goods needs clarification because the nature of the game is not indicated with enough specificity.  The wording in the identification is broad enough to include games classified in multiple classes.  In addition, the applicant has misspelled pai as pal in the identification which should be corrected.  Applicant must amend the identification of goods to specify the common commercial or generic name for the goods.  If there is no common commercial or generic name for the product, then applicant must describe the product and intended consumer as well as its main purpose and intended uses.  TMEP §1402.01.

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate: 

 

Computer game software in the nature of a game of pai gow poker where an element of the game is being performed in space, International Class 9; and/or

 

Card game in the nature of a pai gow poker where an element of the game is being performed in space, International Class 28.

 

Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.

 

If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the following for those goods and/or services based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)   Applicant must list the goods and/or services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP § 1403.01; and

 

(2)   Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and/or services not covered by the fee already paid (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov).  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810 and 1403.01.

 

The applicant has paid for only one class.  The filing fee for adding classes to an application is as follows:

 

(1)     $325 per class, when the fees are submitted with a response filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html; and

 

(2)     $375 per class, when the fees are submitted with a paper response. 

 

37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(i) and (ii); TMEP §810.

 

Disclaimer

 

Applicant must insert a disclaimer of SPACE PAI GOW in the application.  The term SPACE must be disclaimed because the term describes an element of the game performed in space.  The wording PAI GOW POKER must be disclaimed because as indicated in the identification of goods, the term describes the nature of the game related to a pai gow poker.  Trademark Act Section 6, 15 U.S.C. §1056; TMEP §§1213 and 1213.08(a)(i).

 

The following is the accepted standard format for a disclaimer:

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SPACE PAI GOW” apart from the mark as shown.

 

Date of Declaration

 

Applicant must specify the date the application declaration was signed.  TMEP §804.01(b).

 

Translation

 

Applicant must submit an English translation of all foreign wording in the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §809.  In the present case, the wording “PAI GOW” needs translating for the record.  The following translation statement is suggested:  “The English translation of the word PAI GOW in the mark is MAKE NINE.”

 

Search of Office Records

 

The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

 

 

 

/Brendan D. McCauley/

Brendan D. McCauley

Law Office 114

571-272-9459

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

• ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.  NOTE:  Do not respond by e-mail.  THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
• REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining attorney’s name.  NOTE:  The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the Office, not the postmarked date.  To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.  37 C.F.R. §2.197.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.