UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/646475
APPLICANT: North Coast Medical, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
MARK: TOUCH TEST
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 528.06
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION: If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.
Serial Number 76/646475
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:
The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
Registration is refused because the proposed mark merely describes the nature of applicant’s goods. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); TMEP §§1209 et seq.
Applicant has applied to register the mark TOUCH TEST for goods identified as “medical device for evaluating sensory perception of users.” The definition of TOUCH is: “To bring something into light contact with: touched the sore spot with a probe.” The definition of TEST is “A procedure for critical evaluation; a means of determining the presence, quality, or truth of something; a trial: a test of one's eyesight; subjecting a hypothesis to a test; a test of an athlete's endurance.” Used together as TOUCH TEST, the mark immediately describes the nature of the goods, that is, that they are used in a procedure that relies on bringing something, in this case the medical device, into light contact with the skin.
Although the trademark examining attorney has refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
If applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, then applicant must also respond to the following requirements.
An applicant may not base a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f) on ownership of a registration on the Supplemental Register. In re Canron, Inc., 219 USPQ 820 (TTAB 1983); TMEP §1212.04(d).
In this case, applicant has claimed that “the mark has become distinctive, as applied to the applicant’s goods as evidenced by the ownership on the Principal Register for the same mark for related goods of U.S. Registration No. 2267899.” U.S. Registration No. 2267899 is on the Supplemental Register and therefore not eligible as a basis for claiming acquired distinctiveness in this application.
The record indicates that applicant has used its mark for a long time; therefore, applicant may seek registration on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(f), 15 U.S.C. §1052(f), based on acquired distinctiveness. To amend the application to Section 2(f) based on five years use, applicant should submit the following written statement claiming acquired distinctiveness, if accurate:
The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services through applicant’s substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement.
Applicant must verify this statement with a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §1212.05(d).
Applicant has duplicated the mark in the drawing by submitting TOUCH TEST as a typed word and by providing, on the drawing page, a specimen of the mark showing a display of the same mark. The examining attorney has concluded that the drawing page does not show two materially different marks, but applicant must still delete the photograph of the goods so that the drawing page shows only one version of the mark. TMEP §§807.01 and 807.14(a). Applicant should resubmit the drawing page and the specimen on separate pages so that there is no confusion regarding which is which.
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/John M. Gartner/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 102
(571) 272-9255
HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.