PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Input Field |
Entered |
SERIAL NUMBER | 76639678 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 108 |
MARK SECTION (no change) | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
In an Office Action dated July 24, 2006, the Examining Attorney required Applicant to submit a declaraiton stating that that Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce. In response, Applicant submits the necessary declaration. In the July 24, Office action, the Examining Attorney continued and maintained the refusal to register the mark on the grounds that it is merely descriptive of the goods. In response, Applicant intends to amend the mark to be registered on the Supplemental Register. To do so, Applicant must first submit an Allegation of Use to prove that it is using the mark. Therefore, Applicant intends to submit a specimen that is being used in commerce along with a declaration attesting to the use of the specimen shortly after filing this response. After filing the Allegation of Use, Applicant will file a supplemental response to this Office action, requesting that the application be amended to be registered on the Supplemental Register. These filing should address each of the issues raised in this Office action.
|
|
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /doug piper/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Doug Piper |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Officer of the Applicant |
DATE SIGNED | 01/17/2007 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Hunter S. Freeman/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Hunter S. Freeman |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney for Applicant |
DATE SIGNED | 01/17/2007 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Wed Jan 17 17:51:56 EST 2007 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2 0070117175156195159-76639 678-3602da874d0d5249afe1f ba9f9b57bf92b-N/A-N/A-200 70110140022508378 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
In an Office Action dated July 24, 2006, the Examining Attorney required Applicant to submit a declaraiton stating that that Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce. In response, Applicant submits the necessary declaration.
In the July 24, Office action, the Examining Attorney continued and maintained the refusal to register the mark on the grounds that it is merely descriptive of the goods. In response, Applicant intends to amend the mark to be registered on the Supplemental Register. To do so, Applicant must first submit an Allegation of Use to prove that it is using the mark. Therefore, Applicant intends to submit a specimen that is being used in commerce along with a declaration attesting to the use of the specimen shortly after filing this response. After filing the Allegation of Use, Applicant will file a supplemental response to this Office action, requesting that the application be amended to be registered on the Supplemental Register.
These filing should address each of the issues raised in this Office action.