To: | DAK AMERICAS, LLC (tmdocket@oblon.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76639501 - MELT-TEK - 273164US29 |
Sent: | 3/31/2008 12:30:17 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM107@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/639501
MARK: MELT-TEK
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: DAK AMERICAS, LLC
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/31/2008
The examining attorney has reviewed the statement of use and has determined the following:
Specimen Unacceptable for Class 40
The specimen is not acceptable because it does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce. A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of services in the statement of use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56, 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1109.09(b).
The current specimen consists of a label and is unacceptable as evidence of actual service mark use because the mark is not shown in connection with the custom manufacturing services identified in the application. Thus, it fails to show proper use of the applied-for mark in the sale or advertising of the services.
Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting the following:
(1) A substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for the services specified in the statement of use; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed applicant for filing a statement of use.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05. If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c).
Examples of specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services. TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.
Pending a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce for the services specified in the statement of use. 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56, 2.88; TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1109.09(b).
Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.
/asomerville/
Aretha Somerville
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 107
(571) 272-9414
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: If there are any questions about the Office action, please contact the assigned examining attorney. A response to this Office action should be filed using the form available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm. If notification of this Office action was received via e-mail, no response using this form may be filed for 72 hours after receipt of the notification. Do not attempt to respond by e-mail as the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.