Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/636005

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

 

DESCRIPTIVENESS UNDER 2(e)(1)

 

The examining attorney refuses registration on the Principal Register because the proposed mark is merely descriptive of the identified goods.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e)(1); TMEP section 1209 et seq. A mark is merely descriptive under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. 1052(e)(1), if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the relevant goods.  In re Gyulay, 820 F.2d 1216, 3 USPQ2d 1009 (Fed. Cir. 1987);  In re Bed & Breakfast Registry, 791 F.2d 157, 229 USPQ 818 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re MetPath Inc., 223 USPQ 88 (TTAB 1984); In re Bright‑Crest, Ltd., 204 USPQ 591 (TTAB 1979); TMEP section 1209.01(b).

 

In this case, applicant’s mark, “DETANGLEMIST” is a descriptive characteristic of the goods.  The applicant’s goods are “Hair Care Preparations, shampoos, bath and shower preparations for hair.”  The applicant’s mark merely describes a feature, quality or characteristic of applicant’s goods.  “DETANGLE” is defined as “to remove tangles, untangle”.  www.onelook.com.  The term MIST is defined as “fine spray: a fine spray of liquid, e.g. from an atomizer or aerosol.”  Id.  The term DETANGLE describes a characteristic of the goods, that they the goods are for DETANGLING hair.  The term MIST also describes a characteristic of the goods, that they are in the form of a MIST.  The applicant’s goods are preparations or DETANGLERS for the hair which are in MIST form, thus the proposed mark is descriptive of the goods.  Because each term in the proposed mark describes a characteristic of the goods, the entire mark is descriptive based on Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).

 

It is not necessary that a term describe all of the purposes, functions, characteristics or features of the goods to be merely descriptive.  It is enough if the term describes one attribute of the goods.  In re H.U.D.D.L.E., 216 USPQ 358 (TTAB 1982); In re MBAssociates, 180 USPQ 338 (TTAB I1973).  Joining the word “DETANGLE” to “MIST” does not change the meaning of MIST, it merely further describes a characteristic of the goods.  Thus, the proposed mark is descriptive.

 

Finally, there is nothing incongruous or indefinite about the term “DETANGLEMIST.” Nothing requires the exercise of imagination, cogitation, mental processing or gathering of further information in order for a significant portion of the purchaser’s of applicant’s goods to readily perceive the merely descriptive significance of the mark as it relates to “Hair Care Preparations, shampoos, bath and shower preparations for hair.”  Such significance in regard to the proposed mark would be immediately apparent.  In re Gould Paper Corp., 5 USPQ2d 1110, 1112 (Fed. Cir. 1987)

 

Although the examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.  If the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond to the following informalities.

 

CURRENT IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS INDEFINITE

 

The current identification of goods is unacceptable because the term “bath and shower preparations” is indefinite.  The applicant must indicate the specific nature of the terms. The applicant may amend the identification, if accurate, to:

 

Hair care preparations; shampoos; non-medicated bath preparations; shower [indicate type, e.g. gels, creams, foams].  (Class 3)

 

TMEP §1402.01.

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.

 

For your assistance and convenience, the “Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services Manual” may be searched at the Office’s global network computer website address of  http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/menu/tm.html.

 

ADDITION OF CLASSES TO THE APPLICATION

 

If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the following for those goods and/or services based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)     Applicant must list the goods and/or services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP § 1403.01; and

 

(2)     Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and/or services not covered by the fee already paid (current fee information should be confirmed at http://www.uspto.gov).  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810 and 1403.01.

 

SPECIMEN UNACCEPTABLE

 

Applicant must submit (1) a substitute specimen showing the mark as it is used in commerce on the goods or on packaging for the goods, and (2) a statement that “the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application,” verified with a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  37 C.F.R. §§2.56 and 2.59(a); TMEP §904.09.

 

The current specimen of record comprises an advertising mock-up and is unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use because it does not show use in commere with the goods.  Invoices, announcements, order forms, bills of lading, leaflets, brochures, publicity releases and other printed advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods.  In re Bright of America, Inc., 205 USPQ 63 (TTAB 1979); See In re Ultraflight Inc., 221 USPQ 903 (TTAB 1984); TMEP §§904.05 and 904.07.

 

Examples of acceptable specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging, or displays associated with the goods at their point of sale.  TMEP §§904.04 et seq.

 

The following declaration and supporting statement are provided for the applicant’s convenience:

The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed to the applicant for filing a statement of use. 

The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. 1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that the facts set forth in this application are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

_____________________________

                (Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

                                                                                (Date)

SEARCH OF THE OFFICE RECORDS

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP section 1105.01.

 

 

 

/Caroline E. Wood/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 110

(571) 272-9243

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

• ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action has been issued via email, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
• REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.