UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/634890
APPLICANT: BYUN, SAM
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
MARK: CAPACCI
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: BYUN 10.1-00
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/634890
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application, and has determined the following.
Registration is refused because the proposed mark is primarily merely a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); TMEP §§1211 et seq. The primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public determines whether a term is primarily merely a surname. In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F.2d 15, 225 USPQ 652, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Kahan & Weisz Jewelry Mfg. Corp., 508 F.2d 831, 184 USPQ 421 (C.C.P.A. 1975).
The following five factors are used to determine whether a mark is primarily merely a surname:
TMEP §1211.01. See In re Benthin Management GmbH, 37 USPQ2d 1332, 1333-1334 (TTAB 1995); In re Sava Research Corp., 32 USPQ2d 1380 (TTAB 1994) and cases cited therein.
The fact that a term looks and sounds like a surname may contribute to a finding that the primary significance of the term is that of a surname. In re Industrie Pirelli Societa per Azioni, 9 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (TTAB 1988), aff’d, 883 F.2d 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1989); In re Petrin Corp., 231 USPQ 902 (TTAB 1986); TMEP §1211.01(a)(vi).
The issue of determining whether a surname is common or rare is not determined solely by comparing the number of listings of the surname in a computerized database with the total number of listings in that database, because even the most common surname would represent only a small fraction of such a database. Rather, if a surname appears routinely in news reports, articles and other media as to be broadly exposed to the general public, then such surname is not rare and would be perceived by the public as primarily merely a surname. In re Gregory, 70 USPQ2d 1792, 1795 (TTAB 2004).
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has held that materials obtained through computerized text searching are competent evidence to show the descriptive use of terms under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1). In re National Data Corp., 222 USPQ 515, 517 n.3 (TTAB 1984); TMEP §710.01(a).
Please see the attached evidence from the search engine www.google.com and http://people.yahoo.com/, establishing the surname significance of CAPACCI. This evidence shows the proposed mark appearing numerous times as a surname and does not appear to have any other recognized meaning other than as a surname. In addition, the mark has the structure and pronunciation of a surname.
Although the examining attorney has refused registration on the Principal Register, applicant may amend the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. While Supplemental Register registration does not afford all the benefits of registration on the Principal Register, it does provide the following advantages:
NOTE: A mark in an application under Trademark Act Section 1(b) is not eligible for registration on the Supplemental Register until an acceptable amendment to allege use under 37 C.F.R. §2.76 has been filed. 37 C.F.R. §§2.47(d) and 2.75(b); TMEP §1102.03. When a Section 1(b) application is amended to the Supplemental Register, the effective filing date of the application is the date of filing of the amendment to allege use. 37 C.F.R. §2.75(b); TMEP §§206.01 and 1102.03.
Although the examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
If the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond to the following requirement.
General Inquiry on Significance
Applicant must specify whether CAPACCI has any significance in the relevant trade or industry, any geographical significance, or any meaning in a foreign language. 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b).
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to the Office action, as outlined below, please telephone or email the assigned examining attorney.
/Tricia Sonneborn/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 110
phone (571) 272-9225
fax (571) 273-9110
HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.